How Do I Know Me

    Table of contents
    No headers

    The theme for today is "How do I Know Me"

    Today, as always
    is an opportunity to discover
    what happens if we connect the dots
    (and stand back briefly to appreciate the emerging face)

    of things we've talked and thought about
    in our recent meetings and encounters
    which are one "crossroads" of our richly varied lives.

    How do I know Me?
    Let me count the ways.

    The poet E.B. Browning
    (not to be confused with E.B.White)
    wrote a well-known sonnet
    with a similar theme
    substituting "Love" for "Know"
    and "Thee" for "Me"

    and yet the principles are the same
    except for a few little barriers
    ... the idea that Thee is very different from Me
    ... and that Love is very different from Know

    Setting aside sentimentality
    and the cliche-making habit of social memory and attitude
    we might see her poem is really about
    ways of knowing someone, Me or Thee
    or something deeply.

    A bit of Sonnet 43:

    I love thee purely, as they turn from praise.
    I love thee with the passion put to use
    In my old griefs, and with my childhood's faith.
    I love thee with a love I seemed to lose
    With my lost saints


    To understand Browning's poem
    is to undertake a personal exploration
    of deeper ways of knowing
    and she points us toward several

    which would be a contemplative quest
    to unpack or to enter into.

    Deep knowledge and deep love assist each other
    and may even be the same thing
    when cliche is removed.

    One barrier to deep knowledge
    is that familiarity breeds contempt
    and knowledge becomes the mask of presentation
    for a too-familiar way of thinking and relating

    Another is that "self" love
    is deprecated as selfish or even sinful.

    So it jars our cultural sensibility
    that a foreign proverb such as the Lojong
    would advise letting loving-compassion-mind
    start and ground with oneself.

    Another barrier is that knowledge
    often signifies a "failure mode"
    in being and relating

    At least, initially.
    "Don't make me think!"
    Let me go back to just being
    relating
    swimming in the ocean.

    Having been kicked up to the surface
    of the ocean, thinking often stays there,
    resisting returning to the deep or profound.

    "Deep means sad"
    or "Deep means angry"
    How did this get to be a principle of popular Art
    and folk psychology?

    What is it about humans
    that we love patterns?
    Is this a mechanism programmed by evolution for survival?
    Or is it something more basic?

    Perhaps we love patterns
    because we ARE patterns
    and we know them
    through the nameless way we respond to them
    that reveals
    both oneself and one's connection to something more.

    To check this out
    sit with a tree
    for a while, until something changes,
    something becomes different.

    It won't distract you too much by talking
    (at least at first!)
    and you might discover
    how it happens to be beautiful.

    Can it be,
    asking or answering questions about patterns
    is just the add-on
    the mind's icing on the cake,
    If we keep the cake in mind
    and don't stay on the surface of the cake
    where it's all icing.

    What is the important thing about humor?
    It gives us a surprise
    and delivers us from the confines
    of stale knowing
    and a stale feeling of
    "who I am"
    and best of all,
    no thinking required!

    Suppose we turn from the "how" of self-knowing
    to the "who"?

    This would be "Who, part 1"
    The "me" side of "who".

    Western philosophy says
    there's one Me, and it's an essence
    that doesn't change.

    That's a licence,
    a user agreement for the soul
    but what have we been signed up for?
    What are the pros and cons?

    As I recall there was no "opt out"
    when this contract was engaged.

    What's the selling point, the proposition of value?

    It's a nice freedom from interference
    an opportunity for solitude and self reflection
    perhaps a necessary condition for cultivation of "thought"

    as well as

    to be disconnected from others
    and from the constant flow of new knowledge
    that is ever arising
    and disappearing,

    to be condemned to reinventing or rediscovering
    so many things
    that others have done so very well
    and to forego the giving and receiving of gifts
    of knowledge or of "being".

    The "who" side of this knowing
    may challenge these assumptions of one unchanging self

    Let's entertain the notion
    that I'm lots of "me's"
    and I'm different at different times and places
    and with different "others"

    Humor, also, has as a mainstay
    the unpredictable switch from one Me to another
    rather than the automatic habit
    of creating the appearance of one "together" self
    starting when we are very young
    with "peek a boo" and continuing through life
    ... playing with it.

    The relief of letting it go
    and the relief of having it come back together again.

    Does it take a lot of energy to do that?
    A lot of subconscious effort?
    Or is that in some way to follow the low-energy path
    the path of least resistance?

    What are some of your "changing me" experiences?

    Some are unintended, unwanted
    (or you're just not sure)
    puzzles, questions, misgivings,
    square-peg-in-a-round-hole kinds of things.

    Some are intentional
    the gardening or cultivating process
    the earth-digging, planting, watering,
    pruning and harvesting
    of self.

    What is your special place in the Garden?

    Where do you go
    (and who with)
    what rituals do you do
    to do the "self" thing?

    Who are you here-and-now
    or there-and-then
    (and how do you know)?

    Tag page (Edit tags)
    • No tags
    You must login to post a comment.
    Powered by MindTouch Core