Presence to Self, Part 3

    Table of contents
    No headers

    The theme for today is Presence to Self (Part 3)

    What I'm reaching for
    is groundwork
    for a type of in-the-world mindfulness
    that can be present in the "natural" state
    of everyday life
    or be a basis of systematic practice.

    A phrase used in the Play As Being group is
    "appreciating the appearance of being"

    The phrase seems puzzling
    what does it "mean"?

    At this point, "alert" flags might go up
    about language
    and mind's fixation on words.

    It has a hypnotic power.
    We are in its control!

    The value of a slogan
    is that it can remind you
    to re-member
    to bring something back into presence
    to come back into presence,
    or belonging, with it.
    Other than that
    a phrase is an empty vessel.

    Having an experience is one thing
    noticing it is another
    remembering it is another
    (and there are different ways to remember)

    Formulating and describing it is something else again.

    Language can make us "figure bound".
    The idea becomes the main thing, not the experience
    but when they are separate, the figure is dead.

    We're learning to "think beyond language"
    which is necessary to get at this theme.

    What is it to experience oneself
    not as an object, or as an idea,
    but as an experiencer,
    as the event of having experience?

    This isn't introspection or self-consciousness
    in the sense of "looking at oneself"
    which is fixating on an idea of self.

    "Appreciating" is a nice word
    suggesting something that grows in value
    with your interest and attention.

    "Appearance" has a certain power
    to suggest unrealness and detachment
    and create a separation between the object and the observer.
    But that's just one way of knowing.

    The "alchemy" of seeing
    is to take things apart (with attention)
    then bring them back together
    or rather, notice how they are naturally together.

    When experience has a quality of "beauty"
    it's not sentiment or pleasantness
    but a hint that fuller dimensions of awareness are present
    an inner quality of softness and strength
    "soft eyes" and a soft response
    and also abiding, not turning away
    from whatever is invoked.

    There is a certain "pleasure principle" involved
    but it's subtle, not just about pleasant feelings
    but about contact and fullness.
     
    This awareness brings both sides of experience together
    It is "in" the object and "in" the eye of the Beholder,
    an eye that looks both ways at once.

    What the world offers you, in the case of beauty
    is what you are offering it:
    Yourself:
    as many aspects of yourself
    as you have held in free, creative, responsive consciousness:
    this is "Beholding"
    and the "world" likes it!

    Note in that last idea
    the dynamic interplay of the Taoist / I Ching polarities
    the Creative and the Receptive.

    While western philosophers of aesthetics
    in past centuries pointed out
    the experiential side of this
    by saying, beauty has a pleasant, pleasurable aspect
    and an awe inspiring (or even awe-ful) aspect

    I expect it's not long before these show up, too, in the neuroscience lab
    as two detectable modes of emotional activity
    at work in all thinking and experiencing.

    The mystic and integrative philosopher Gurdjieff
    titled a book after this principle of self-meets-world-in-experience:
    "Life is only Real, then, when I Am"

    (This has at least two meanings)
    The "I Am" is about Being
    which is a short word
    for the universe-filling event of being real.

    The Self is known through this contact with reality
    and the quality of that contact
    You look at the world
    and see a quality of Self
    as a quality of the the event of contact.
    it can be resisting, oppositional, fixated
    flowing, appreciative, dynamic
    and so on.

    As an example
    that involves thinking beyond language
    consider the experiences of yawning, and boredom.

    People are curious about these commonplaces of everyday experience
    but when they discuss them or investigate them
    it seems, it's all "about":
    such and such a scientific theory,
    or social convention,
    but not much about what happens for oneself, the direct experience.

    As an experiment
    when you yawn or are bored
    don't let it get away
    don't try to change it
    have it as it is... get into it:
    what is going on here?
    Observe it
    and "do" it
    don't rush to, or come from language.

    Then, while it is fresh in mind
    reflect on that experience
    and the traces of yourself that were in it
    think about it and give it names
    make up descriptions
    that remember both sides of the experience
    so you can remember and more easily talk about it
    to yourself or others.

    A fuller mindfulness meditation
    would likewise "ground" in the experience
    and also, give attention
    to the how, and the effects
    of using language in relationship to the experience.

    For now, we can say about this
    that a good use of language
    is to direct one's attention
    to recall - that is, to "call" something closer to oneself
    when it is already near
    with a quality of invocation
    or even intimate conversation.

    Tag page (Edit tags)
    • No tags
    You must login to post a comment.
    Powered by MindTouch Core