Pema proposes the following agenda:
0) Email
Eos has started a google email group for the upcoming Malta retreat.
1) How to balance vision and details in our WG meetings?
Soon after Mark joined us, in the Spring,
he has reminded us of a saying by Padmasambhava:
My view is higher than the sky, but my attention
to actions and their results is finer than flour.
How can we cultivate that kind of balance in the WG?
Five options have been proposed in email so far:
1) spending half an hour in each meeting on details,
and half an hour on more general discussion of
how we see/sense PaB and its growth;
2) while we still have a considerable backlog of
details, spending an hour a week on details, and
spending another hour a week on wider issues;
3) try to address all details from an open space with
an open mind, viewing all of PaB through working
with the details;
4) schedule a several-hour WG SL retreat, some weekend
in December;
5) we might try to set aside one of the meetings each
month for a more visionary agenda, and that week
address only pressing details.
2) Fundraising and Donations Listing
The general consensus of the PlayasBeing group members who have replied
via email, is that the European model of not listing individual donors with specific
monetary amounts given is preferable to listing amounts publicly.
A. is everything firmly in place, so that we can ask people now to
give donations, whether they have pledged money already or not?
Can we give them clear instructions where/how to donate money?
Who will send out a notice describing that? The note should
probably ask to include either SL name or "anonymous"; see also:
B. do we have a clear system to register automatically who gave money;
does PayPal address that? If somebody just pays through PayPal with
their RL name, we may have no clue which avatar corresponds to that.
C. shall we make a final recommendation of exactly how to list time and
money donations on a PaB web site, taking into account all the
reactions we've gotten so far?
3) New Guardians
No new guardian candidates, so far.
4) Chat Log Annotation
The PlayasBeing group has decided against labeling the chat logs in
an automated way, and has moved toward individual guardian detail,
such as Stevenaia's suggestion of writing:
"The Guardian (on Call) for this meeting was stevenaia Michinaga.
The comments are by stevenaia Michinaga.....The following Guardians
were in attendance for this session: Pema Pera, stevenaia Michinaga,
etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, "
Do we want to list all guardians at the top of each chat log page,
as Stevenaia suggested, and some others agreed with, or not, since
yet some others were unhappy with it?
5) A Two-Tier System of Guardians?
The idea has been brought to the WG to have more than one level of PaB membership,
perhaps in the form of plain PaB "membership" and a more actively involved
"guardianship."
6) Different Kinds of Sessions/ Emphasizing "Pure Play as Being/Applied PlayasBeing"
A. Growing out of discussions within our weekly guardian meetings, Storm has brought
forth the idea of having different kinds of sessions. In a recent email, Storm wrote:
"Maxine has commented occasionally on boundary issues. I see the possibility of
having more than one kind of session as a potential solution to all sorts of seemingly
disparate problems we are having, many of which include boundary issues."
Some of the kinds of sessions which have been discussed are:
1) "pure PaB": the practice of PaB itself
2) "applied PaB" how practice of PaB influences our life
3) newcomer/Introductory sessions
3) pure contemplation and spirituality
4) applied spirituality in politics, economics, society
5) unrecorded sessions, such as those Adams, Gaya, Eos, and Eliza
have organized
The suggested focus is toward 1 and 2, for regular PaB sessions.
B. Do we have specific ideas we might try out or discuss within the larger PlayasBeing
group? Further thoughts or frameworks we might discuss?
7) PaB Village
Are there any suggestions for new events and/or structures in the
PaB Village, perhaps in relation to in-world retreats?
8) Coordinator as Role Name
The six WG members play a role as coordinators, yet they also
delegate some of their responsibilities to other coordinators
outside the group; would it be more clear if the WG members
would be given another role name, different from "coordinator"?
9) Outreach: Community Gateway
We may want to consider offering PaB as one of the groups thatImages 0 | ||
---|---|---|
No images to display in the gallery. |