Page last modified 18:00, 11 Apr 2012 by Aphrodite MacBain
2012.04.11 Working group Agenda and Minutes
Table of contents
No headers1. Priorities for the next 6 months : brainstorming
2. Aph's report on the Friends of Being status
3. How can we "host better" the sessions at the pavilion?
4. When should the party items be taken down
5. New WG members and roles update
6. Over a year ago we had a discussion of the need to have some sort of explicit licensing (such as Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/)) of what we put on our web site, including content in posted session logs. That particular licensing is in my mind a kind of default, and I think it's fairly widespread for such content, Eos will bring it up again for the WG's consideration.
Comments by Alfred as he wont be attending:
I will not make it, but here are a few thoughts on the agenda items.
1. I think the background to this question was well set by Eliza's email on the "state of PaB" so to speak. I see a dichotomy of the early PaB (more serious, contemplative) and PaB of today (more fun and merry). Some people pine for the past, some don't, some quit. Speaking for myself, I think the current PaB is a natural consequence of a
general decline of SL and diminishing presence of the PaB father - Pema. I think that many things that we do are out of habit. Like keeping the logs or hosting sessions. Eliza raises good questions in her email in this regard. It's like we go on with the original PaB while it's long gone. OK, I'll put a smiley here so it wouldn't come out too grim :)
2. Interested to hear the numbers on this. I think Blue volunteered to look after this group, no?
3. I'd go with more theme sessions. Aph does that now and then. Picks a topic beforehand and makes an announcement. Let's have a topic for each session! Kira Japan is awesome at it. Very structured.
4. I certainly like the party cheer around the sim. Getting used to is not good, though :) I'd say a month maybe? Also, is the train a part of the party set up?
5. - no suggestions
6. I put my thoughts on this in another email. But in short: people in the logs gave permission to use their words on the wiki, but they're still original creators and hold copyright on their words. We have to ask them first if they agree on the terms of the license being proposed.
1. I think the background to this question was well set by Eliza's email on the "state of PaB" so to speak. I see a dichotomy of the early PaB (more serious, contemplative) and PaB of today (more fun and merry). Some people pine for the past, some don't, some quit. Speaking for myself, I think the current PaB is a natural consequence of a
general decline of SL and diminishing presence of the PaB father - Pema. I think that many things that we do are out of habit. Like keeping the logs or hosting sessions. Eliza raises good questions in her email in this regard. It's like we go on with the original PaB while it's long gone. OK, I'll put a smiley here so it wouldn't come out too grim :)
2. Interested to hear the numbers on this. I think Blue volunteered to look after this group, no?
3. I'd go with more theme sessions. Aph does that now and then. Picks a topic beforehand and makes an announcement. Let's have a topic for each session! Kira Japan is awesome at it. Very structured.
4. I certainly like the party cheer around the sim. Getting used to is not good, though :) I'd say a month maybe? Also, is the train a part of the party set up?
5. - no suggestions
6. I put my thoughts on this in another email. But in short: people in the logs gave permission to use their words on the wiki, but they're still original creators and hold copyright on their words. We have to ask them first if they agree on the terms of the license being proposed.
Powered by MindTouch Core