2016.04.04 13:00 - TSK: Human Narrative

    Table of contents
    No headers

    The Guardians for this meeting were Riddle, Bleu, Cat and Mick. :) Eliza posted the session.

     


    --BELL--


    Riddle Sideways: hi Cat
    Catrinamonblue Resident: Hi Riddle :) I'll brb sorry
    Riddle Sideways: is ok, am doing several other things
    Riddle Sideways: going to just listen if session happens
    Mickorod Renard: hiya
    Riddle Sideways: hi mick
    Riddle Sideways: finally just read email.
    Riddle Sideways: Eliza will not be here
    Bleu Oleander: hi all :)
    Mickorod Renard: just trying a new server thingy
    Catrinamonblue Resident: Hi Mick, Blue :)
    Riddle Sideways: hi again Bleu
    Mickorod Renard: Hi Bleu cat

    Riddle Sideways: was just enjoying the party photos from email
    Mickorod Renard: I suspected eliza wouldnt make it
    Bleu Oleander: was hard to edit down :)
    Bleu Oleander: I think she said an email that she wasn't
    Riddle Sideways: :)
    Bleu Oleander: congrats again Cat :)
    Riddle Sideways: oh yes, mazel tov
    Mickorod Renard: did storm or eos make it?
    Catrinamonblue Resident: thank you :)
    Catrinamonblue Resident: just fussing with facebook now to change name and put picture :)
    Bleu Oleander: :)
    Mickorod Renard: 8 years,,how time passes
    Riddle Sideways: yep
    Mickorod Renard: bit scary


    Bleu Oleander: so this is our "9th" year :)
    Catrinamonblue Resident: :)
    Riddle Sideways: Pema's email was nice
    Bleu Oleander: next year's party should be fun to connect all the 9's
    Bleu Oleander: yes!
    Mickorod Renard: yes, it would have been nice had he popped in
    Riddle Sideways: what year was it that the party went on all day?
    Riddle Sideways: with concert etc.
    Bleu Oleander: there was an all day party?
    Mickorod Renard: cant remember
    Riddle Sideways: anyway,
    Mickorod Renard: i think also at that time we had a greater spread of people covering a larger range of time zones
    Riddle Sideways: yes, it starts early morning


    --BELL--

     

    Riddle Sideways: dancing in the fields playing instruments
    Mickorod Renard: Pila would have been first from hawaii i guess, time zone wise
    Riddle Sideways: is that right?
    Mickorod Renard: actually i think I am wrong
    Riddle Sideways: hmmmm, thought hawaii was the last
    Mickorod Renard: he he
    Riddle Sideways: Japan might be first
    Riddle Sideways: all the Japanese left to kira

    Riddle Sideways: ok, need inspiration to get back to TSK
    Bleu Oleander: :)
    Riddle Sideways: have gotten out of it
    Bleu Oleander: too much partying :)
    Riddle Sideways: now behind AGAIN
    Mickorod Renard: yes, tsk,,I have been a bit neglectful
    Mickorod Renard: i did read the bit about the glow


    Bleu Oleander: I think we are starting chapter 6 on thurs?
    Bleu Oleander: officially begining "time"?
    Mickorod Renard: yes
    Riddle Sideways: it's about Time :)
    Mickorod Renard: I would have loved a recap on what we should understand up to date but I feel its all a bit open and individual
    Bleu Oleander: I think we each can know where we are, yes?
    Bleu Oleander: don't think there is any pressure to "understand" anything? or am I missing something?
    Catrinamonblue Resident: I'm still behaind, I haven't done any reading for a few weeks now.....
    Riddle Sideways: :)

     

    Mickorod Renard: I have a tendency to look at most things and just see non attachment....which doesn't impress my wife,,especially when it comes to wanting the plates washed
    Catrinamonblue Resident: :)
    Bleu Oleander: from my point of view it seems that the exercises are open to individual perceptions, experiences? really no right or wrong?
    Bleu Oleander: is that how you see it?
    Bleu Oleander: or am I a bit off LOL ... which would be surprising ha ha!
    Mickorod Renard: I think that is true Bleu..and it may be best to stick to that unless we all come to some unified arrangement
    Mickorod Renard: I am hoping what we are doing is a ground work for greater revelation as we move on
    Bleu Oleander: for me these are mental thoughts and feelings, not something concrete in that sense, for you too?
    Riddle Sideways: funny how we will all get to the same point at the end of the book


    Catrinamonblue Resident: I'm going to slip away... I'm too far behind to add much to the discussion and I picked a bad time to update facebook, getting a ton of pm's :)
    Catrinamonblue Resident: see you all later :)
    Riddle Sideways: ok, cat
    Bleu Oleander: bye Cat, take care
    Mickorod Renard: bye Cat..hope all is good


    Bleu Oleander: is there going to be a "same place" at the end of the book?
    Bleu Oleander: is there a goal?
    Riddle Sideways: imagining a ton of pm's
    Bleu Oleander: not trick questions ha! really interested in what you think
    Riddle Sideways: maybe a same knowledge
    Mickorod Renard: this is what i was wondering but there is a general feeling of 'wait and see where it takes us'
    Riddle Sideways: ':)
    Bleu Oleander: same knowledge re what?
    Riddle Sideways: maybe we end up at the same Great Knowledge
    Riddle Sideways: at the last section
    Bleu Oleander: which means .... ?
    Riddle Sideways: not sure
    Riddle Sideways: just speculating
    Bleu Oleander: kk
    Riddle Sideways: where a 'wait and see' gets us


    Riddle Sideways: the group brings in so much insight
    Mickorod Renard: I would love there to be some unified great knowledge that we will all encounter at the smae time
    Bleu Oleander: one thing I noticed was that we never get beyond the "great" concepts ... this is my 3rd time reading and don't ever arrive at anything that could be called an "answer"
    Riddle Sideways: wouldn't that be nice
    Bleu Oleander: I do enjoy exploring it tho
    Riddle Sideways: to both of you
    Riddle Sideways: darn Lag
    Mickorod Renard: yes Bleu,,I sense that too and it raises some skeptisism in me


    --BELL--

     

    Bleu Oleander: skeptisism about what?
    Mickorod Renard: re no answer*
    Mickorod Renard: but I am sure there is something in this book should I be able to grasp it
    Bleu Oleander: Eliza had suggested that I was a "skeptic" ... perhaps because I ask questions?
    Bleu Oleander: but asking questions is the only way to understand for me at least
    Riddle Sideways: perhaps we are being goal oriented
    Bleu Oleander: we are if we are expecting to all meet at some end
    Mickorod Renard: well, skeptic may be the wrong word i used...as asking questions is surely a good thing,,and that is what I like too
    Bleu Oleander: :)
    Bleu Oleander: if something, some concept is secure, it should stand up to our questions
    Bleu Oleander: I don't think you can be a skeptic of an open exploration ... I think of skeptic as someone challenging a "belief" system or concept
    Bleu Oleander: oops talking over bell :)

     

    The narrative of being human...


    Mickorod Renard: also i am quite content with life but feel sometimes that i am allowing myself to blindly follow the narative of being human..i prefer to look beyond the box
    Mickorod Renard: if that makes sense
    Bleu Oleander: we can only look beyond the box from within the human context I think ... there is no view for us outside of through our humanity, do you agree?
    Mickorod Renard: well...i am not sure 'humanity' has a set standard
    Bleu Oleander: and there's a lot to explore there even if somewhat limited
    Bleu Oleander: not a set standard, just that we are human and have some limitations based on our humanity
    Bleu Oleander: we are always human exploring what its like to be human, aren't we?
    Riddle Sideways: the book is trying, nugging, allowing us out of the human look

    Mickorod Renard: I see many automomous types of people that i feel have detached from humanity
    Riddle Sideways: personally, spend a lot of time trying to not explore as if not human
    Mickorod Renard: I am presently trying to define what is precious as a human
    Bleu Oleander: really, aren't they just humans too ... perhaps we don't understand all humans, but they're still humans, can't really detach from that yet ... until we merge with tech :)
    Bleu Oleander: what is precious for you?
    Bleu Oleander: I don't think we can get out of the human look, myself, so maybe that's a point of difference in understanding?
    Mickorod Renard: yes Bleu, but I am worried that as there becomes divisions between us in wealth and health and so forth there is or may be a tendency to forget the humanity
    Bleu Oleander: well, we can say we forget humanity, but so far we are still human ... until we merge with tech
    Mickorod Renard: yes, agree we are all humans, biologically

    Riddle Sideways: 1. studying tech AI and processing deeply enough to try to get it
    Riddle Sideways: 2. spending 8 years playing with Being

    Bleu Oleander: there are still some challenging concepts for AI to get before we would consider it to be close to human
    Mickorod Renard: as humans we could just say its our purpose to destroy the planet.......it may be ai that saves us from our self destruction
    Riddle Sideways: oh, was answering ways of thinking that are not the me human


    --BELL--

     

    Bleu Oleander: you're not a human studying AI and/or Being?
    Riddle Sideways: in one sense
    Bleu Oleander: just tell me to shut up if asking too many questions lol ... I'm ok with listening too
    Bleu Oleander listens to Riddle :)
    Mickorod Renard: I am just wondering whether we are forgetting the basic foundations of what we would like to think means Human ,when it comes to treating fellow humans with humanity
    Riddle Sideways: trying very hard to be studying from that removed place
    Mickorod Renard: sorry riddle, carry on pls
    Riddle Sideways: not genenic algotyhms as human-like gene, but as a new different way

    Mickorod Renard: now thats interesting
    Bleu Oleander: say more ...

    Riddle Sideways: yes, a human proposig to pretend to be some atoms grouping into a molecule
    Riddle Sideways: there is still a single human pretending to attempt to see the larger non-individual stance
    Riddle Sideways: doing a lot of pretending from your point of view
    Bleu Oleander: pretending?
    Mickorod Renard: you mean like hive?
    Riddle Sideways: yet coping an attitude that a 'me' really is at an other point of view
    Riddle Sideways: ummmm focus setting
    Riddle Sideways: taking a step of/on belief
    Mickorod Renard: ah, I think I see
    Bleu Oleander: "me" and "I" are constructions not things, yes?
    Riddle Sideways: then setting down in that new place to look about
    Riddle Sideways: yes
    Riddle Sideways: and loosening those constructions
    Mickorod Renard: I think the book points that way
    Riddle Sideways: loosening the object-events
    Riddle Sideways: the subject-verbs
    Bleu Oleander: I don't feel its possible to detach from some weak construction of "me or I" that can "know" something or "experience" something
    Riddle Sideways: =have to think on that sentence
    Mickorod Renard: he he
    Mickorod Renard: me too
    Bleu Oleander: :)
    Riddle Sideways: seems a weak construct could easily be detached
    Mickorod Renard: that next section,,where Eliza called the Glow,,refers to some of this
    Bleu Oleander: weak in the sense that it runs under the hood
    Mickorod Renard: i think
    Riddle Sideways: if there is a strong construct to 'know' is only for an "I" to do
    Riddle Sideways: then could not be detacted


    Bleu Oleander: you would not be able to experience anything and know it if you didn't connect it to some sense of you
    Bleu Oleander: know it meaning being able to reflect on it
    Riddle Sideways: hmmmm, mostly true
    Mickorod Renard: thats how I view it bleu
    Bleu Oleander: what's not true?
    Riddle Sideways: there are a few not places
    Riddle Sideways: ummmm, how do you view the spaces between thoughts
    Riddle Sideways: are they there?
    Bleu Oleander: I don't view them as anything
    Riddle Sideways: can you reflect on them
    Bleu Oleander: then I would be thinking
    Riddle Sideways: are they known to not be there?
    Bleu Oleander: don't know
    Mickorod Renard: but much goes on in the sub concious that we do not conciously dwel on
    Bleu Oleander: don't know what that means really
    Bleu Oleander: yes sub conscious goes on more than conscious
    Bleu Oleander: there is much more going on that we have no access to than we are conscious of
    Bleu Oleander: from what I'm reading and talking about, consciousness is just the tip of the iceberg
    Riddle Sideways: yes
    Bleu Oleander: for good reason lol
    Riddle Sideways: :)
    Bleu Oleander: we can't pay attention to too many things at once
    Bleu Oleander: we would get bogged down in the details :)
    Mickorod Renard: Its a facinating subject.....from this sort of reasoning can you see an object to the book?
    Bleu Oleander: its amazing what goes on just to move our hands


    --BELL--

     

    Riddle Sideways: phone. need to go
    Bleu Oleander: the book is a disciplined way to think about things
    Bleu Oleander: kk
    Riddle Sideways: bye for now
    Bleu Oleander: take care
    Mickorod Renard: bye riiddle,,good chat
    Bleu Oleander: thanks Riddle
    Mickorod Renard: thanks
    Bleu Oleander: sorry if too many questions
    Mickorod Renard: its very deep ,,no great questions
    Bleu Oleander: I think a lot about these kinds of things
    Mickorod Renard: I mean,,all the questions are great
    Mickorod Renard: me too


    Bleu Oleander: taking a class on Kierkegaard atm
    Bleu Oleander: fascinating
    Bleu Oleander: had many of the same questions 200 years ago
    Mickorod Renard: I may look that up
    Bleu Oleander: back to Socrates even!!
    Bleu Oleander: I just finished a great book
    Bleu Oleander: "at the existentialist cafe" by Sarah Bakewell
    Mickorod Renard: they say tho, that phillosophy raises more questions that gives answers
    Bleu Oleander: gave me a sense of how long people have been grappling with these questions
    Mickorod Renard: for sure
    Bleu Oleander: that's true Mick
    Bleu Oleander: truth is "there are no answers" LOL
    Bleu Oleander: only questions
    Bleu Oleander: oops sorry bell


    Mickorod Renard: one person i never liked was ayn rand, but I tussle with something she said,,i do all the time
    Bleu Oleander: me either
    Mickorod Renard: the bit re humans being either cows in the field or not
    Bleu Oleander: I don't relate to her philosophy
    Bleu Oleander: I've just started "Phenomenology of Perception" by Merleau-Ponty
    Mickorod Renard: I dont think I do,,but that bit about cows in the field just keeps me trying to work it out
    Bleu Oleander: in what sense?
    Mickorod Renard: I bet that good
    Mickorod Renard: well..I think it means that some folk,,regardless of success at it..just go to work and then to bed on a repetitive routine
    Mickorod Renard: without any creative or arty nature
    Bleu Oleander: I think we can't know their minds tho
    Bleu Oleander: look at Einstein
    Bleu Oleander: he "just worked in the mailroom"
    Mickorod Renard: for sure,,thats a weak point in that view
    Mickorod Renard: but its made me strive to question
    Mickorod Renard: everything
    Mickorod Renard: and made me more creative
    Bleu Oleander: what someone does that is shown to us is not the totality of their being
    Mickorod Renard: very true
    Bleu Oleander: we shouldn't "rest" with a set conception of someone ... never know what's under the hood
    Mickorod Renard: best not to be judgemental..except of myself
    Bleu Oleander: yes :)
    Mickorod Renard: :)
    Mickorod Renard: but sometimes I think..would I prefer to be a cow or a fox
    Mickorod Renard: a cows life is prob easier
    Bleu Oleander: cows have a different "umwelt" than we do
    Bleu Oleander: they're good at being cows
    Mickorod Renard: but a fox riskier and free
    Mickorod Renard: are we not being groomed to be cows for the rulers
    Bleu Oleander: be a cow to the best of your ability, be a fox to the best of your ability, be human to the best of your ability .... means different things
    Mickorod Renard: yes, but what is it to be human,,that brings us back to what i sort of started with
    Mickorod Renard: he he
    Bleu Oleander: we already know
    Bleu Oleander: we are
    Bleu Oleander: ha! there's no one else to ask
    Mickorod Renard: Bleu, I have to slip away
    Bleu Oleander: ok me too
    Bleu Oleander: thanks for the conversation
    Mickorod Renard: great chatting
    Bleu Oleander: take care
    Mickorod Renard: thankyou
    Mickorod Renard: nite nite from uk
    Bleu Oleander: nite

    Tag page (Edit tags)
    • No tags
    Viewing 2 of 2 comments: view all
    I think of skepticism as a way of asking questions, not necessarily as a position set up against another position, although it can be that too. For something to withstand scrutiny is a worthwhile endeavor if one wishes to invest in something. :)

    Interestingly, when I was following my yogachara rabbit hole recently, I learned that at the time this kind of buddhist philosophy came to fore was in contrast (not necessarily disagreement) with another, that I'd previously thought of as the same thing. What was said is that madyamika philosophy was negation ("not that, not that") and yogachara the other side of the coin.

    Endlessly interesting to find so many facets of approach. edited 04:09, 5 Apr 2016
    Posted 04:07, 5 Apr 2016
    I was understanding skeptic as "a person who questions or doubts something (such as a claim or statement) : a person who often questions or doubts things" (dictionary meaning). Someone who merely asks questions about something isn't a skeptic to me, just someone who is curious. Skeptics are in a sense placing themselves up against a "claim" expressing a doubt about the validity of a claim or statement. I do doubt the validity of some of the TSK claims, however, TSK uses many terms like "great space" which really have no claim to prove or doubt. In any case, I'm mostly just asking questions about what others think and what are the grounds for their ideas. Not all questions or "questioneers" are of a skeptic nature. That said, I feel its important to question all texts and claims for ourselves, nothing should be taken at face value. Everything is embedded in some conceptual system and involves interpretation. It is interesting to find so many facets of approach!
    Posted 13:22, 5 Apr 2016
    Viewing 2 of 2 comments: view all
    You must login to post a comment.
    Powered by MindTouch Core