Wol Euler was guardian for this session, sitting in for Maxine.
Wol Euler: evening samuel
Samuel Okelly: hi wol :)
Wol Euler: brb
Samuel Okelly: k
Wol Euler: back
Wol Euler: have you been going to Stim's lectures on the Contemplative Traditions?
Wol Euler: I think I saw you at the first one
Wol Euler: hello pema
Pema Pera: Hi Wol and Sam!
Wol Euler: how are you today, Pema?
Pema Pera: fine, glad to be home, after the traveling here and there of the last week
Wol Euler: :)
Pema Pera: and how about you?
Wol Euler: meh. Middling. fear that I am catching a cold.
Wol Euler: otherwise OK :)
Pema Pera had only seen the term "midling" in translations from Sanskrit to English so far :-)
Wol Euler: heheheh, wonder if it means the same as I feel.
Pema Pera: I'm sure what you feel would sound more interesting when expressed in Sanskrit, don't you think?
Wol Euler chuckles.
Wol Euler: like listening to foreign-language films in the original, what they say always sounds more interseting than what's in the subtitles
Pema Pera: like "the two truths of catching a cold and being also perfectly all right"
Pema Pera: must be a very long word in Sanskrit
Wol Euler: well, physical and mental/psychic/spiritually
Pema Pera: yes, I know the feeling, growing up in Holland almost all films were foreign and subtitled!
Wol Euler smiles
Wol Euler: I came close to believing that I could undestatnd Russian, from watching subtitled films (Tarkovsky)
Moon Fargis: greetings
Pema Pera: Hi Moon!
Wol Euler: an illusion, of course, similar to deja vu, due to the very short time between seeing/reading the words and hearing htem spoken
Wol Euler: hello moon
Wol Euler: and hello tarmel
Wol Euler: and scathach! good evening
Moon Fargis: hi tarm sca and dug >(
Moon Fargis: :)
Wol Euler: and doug. indeed.
Scathach Rhiadra: Hi Wol:)
Pema Pera: Hi Tarmel and Scathach and Doug!
Scathach Rhiadra: Hello all:)
Wol Euler: busy session tonight.
doug Sosa: hi all.
Pema Pera: all of a sudden, yes!
Moon Fargis: mmh *nods*
Tarmel Udimo: hi doug moon pema wol and scath and sam
Samuel Okelly: back
Moon Fargis: well goo just want to announce that the Pab library, as its the main building and the rooms with furniture, is finished now, sure it was an hobby project so it too its time :)
Wol Euler: wb sam
Moon Fargis: that means i will sonn write a email that explains how you can add books to the library
Moon Fargis: and articles
doug Sosa: wonderful.
Wol Euler: cool
Tarmel Udimo: hey that's wonderful
doug Sosa: how do we find it?
Scathach Rhiadra: that's great
Moon Fargis: should be on the tp boards of pab
Wol Euler: hello fefonz
Moon Fargis: but i also have a lm :)
Tarmel Udimo: hey fefonz
Scathach Rhiadra: Hello Fefonz
Fefonz Quan: Hey everybody :-)
Pema Pera: Hi Fef!
Pema Pera: congratulations, Moon!
Pema Pera: Glad to hear that
doug Sosa: thank you.
Moon Fargis: thx now we need pictures and stuff as it shall also be a little art gallery
Scathach Rhiadra: some pics of PaB meetings
Moon Fargis: yes maybe also picts that are insightfull
Scathach Rhiadra nods
Pema Pera wondering whether PaB meeting pictures are insightful or not . . . .
Scathach Rhiadra: :)
Pema Pera: btw, Moon, have you heard about the 12-year Kira birthday party, Tuesday?
Moon Fargis: yep
Samuel Okelly: please excuse me again every1 :(
Wol Euler: hb sam
Pema Pera: and have you heard about the circle of booth outside the Kira Cafe, in which we advertise the various Kira activities, Moon?
Moon Fargis: ehm.. no .. or i cant remember wich often happens :)
Wol Euler: corvi and gen and I had a look on Thursday, it looks very nice
Tarmel Udimo: here it comes:-)
Pema Pera: well, we have a circle of booth, one for PaB, one for Adams' Art project, one for each Kira workshop, some 15 or so in total
Tarmel Udimo: its super!
Wol Euler: and a lovely fountain
Pema Pera: Would you like us to reserve a booth for you, to meet people to talk about the PaB library?
Scathach Rhiadra: yes, it looks great
Fefonz Quan: with cushions
Pema Pera: from 1 to 3 pm on Tuesday
Pema Pera: so that is for you 10 pm to midnight Tuesday evening
Moon Fargis: sure
Pema Pera: will you be available during that time?
Pema Pera: great!
Moon Fargis: as i have my meditation at 12 it will work
Pema Pera: Well, I suggest that you go over right now toyour booth :-)
Pema Pera: I am IMing Caledonia who is waiting for you.
Pema Pera: http://slurl.com/secondlife/BaikUn/254/96/251
Moon Fargis: hmhmms yes sir!
Fefonz Quan: Pema, don't send moon away from us so soon ...
Pema Pera: thank you !
Tarmel Udimo: bye moooooooooooon
Pema Pera: he'll be back, Fefonz
Fefonz Quan: too late :)
Wol Euler: bye moon, take care
Tarmel Udimo: ****Howlllzzzzzzzz****
Pema Pera: librarian on duty !
Fefonz Quan: infact even if found he can be in both places in parallel, i wouldn't be surprised
Pema Pera: too early . . .
Pema Pera: Caledonia just reported that the sim is offline . . . .
Pema Pera: oh well
Wol Euler: oops
Pema Pera: ah!
Wol Euler: guess moon will be back sooner than he thought
Fefonz Quan: sim's not :)
Pema Pera: it all feels like an episode of Startrek
Pema Pera: will they make it to the surface of the planet?
Tarmel Udimo: ahhh startrek
Wol Euler: and will Kirk get his end away this time?
Fefonz Quan: oh, good old Spock
Scathach Rhiadra: :)
Wol Euler blushes and puts her hand over her mouth
Tarmel Udimo: will he fall in love AGAIN?
Fefonz Quan: we are all giving away our age here
Wol Euler: :)
Tarmel Udimo: a friend mentioned startreck the other day and satred talking about kirk and spock and looked at me aghast
Tarmel Udimo: yes we are he thought I was refering to captin pickard
Fefonz Quan: yep. *boldly* go where no man has gone before :)
Samuel Okelly: back (again ;-)
Pema Pera admits that he enjoyed TNG of Pickard far more than earlier or later series
Tarmel Udimo: yep straight into being
Wol Euler: wb sam
Tarmel Udimo: yes?
Tarmel Udimo: more advanced!
Fefonz Quan didn't watch TNG...
Samuel Okelly: loved TNG and Voyager but never really took to DS9 though odo fascinated me :)
Tarmel Udimo: ahhh pema who would have thought a TREKKIE
Scathach Rhiadra: the characters were better realised in TNG, more rounded
Fefonz Quan: yes, Pickard was round ;-)
Scathach Rhiadra: his head was:)
Wol Euler: :)
Fefonz Quan: my point exactly
Pema Pera: and the stories were far more intricate and complex in TNG . . ..
Tarmel Udimo: yes they were
Scathach Rhiadra: I loved Q
Fefonz Quan: they even predicted the cell phones
Pema Pera: yeah, Q was great!
Pema Pera: the anti-Pickard
Samuel Okelly: i always thought Q was a very unconvincing character
Fefonz Quan: drakcip?
Pema Pera: he convinced me, at least during his relatively short appearances
Scathach Rhiadra nods
Pema Pera: but he was a bit out of place, yes, Sam
Pema Pera: I guess they didn't know how to work him in further
Pema Pera: more a comic relief
Samuel Okelly: for all of his power he was remarkably ignorant of mankind
Fefonz Quan: well, that happens...
Pema Pera: probably not that interested :)
Samuel Okelly: on the contrary, Q found mankind fascinating didnt he?
Scathach Rhiadra: as a species we are probably not all that interesting:)
Samuel Okelly: hence all his challenges
Pema Pera: well, fascinating enough to play for a while, I guess :)
Wol Euler: wb moon
Wol Euler: and riddle, welcome
Moon Fargis: rehi
Scathach Rhiadra: wb Moon
Fefonz Quan: wb Moon
Samuel Okelly: hi moo / rid
Riddle Sideways: Hi Everybody, sorry I am late
Scathach Rhiadra: Hello Riddle
Fefonz Quan: hey riddle
Tarmel Udimo: hey riddle
Pema Pera: hi Riddle
Samuel Okelly: I think Q was a portrayal of a God like figure that was designed to appeal to a secular audience
Riddle Sideways: please don't let me stop the conversation :)
Moon Fargis: star trek Q ?
Wol Euler: mmhmm
Samuel Okelly: an omnipotent power WITH limitations that restricted his understanding and those same limitation were to be found in the humans
Moon Fargis: hmhmm
Riddle Sideways: he said he was an immature Q
Pema Pera: a kind of demiurg?
Moon Fargis: well Q knowed everything... beside one thing, humanity
Samuel Okelly: like I say, Q to me was an unconvincing character of contredictions
Scathach Rhiadra: well, I enjoyed him:)
Riddle Sideways: they could have done soo much more with that character
Riddle Sideways: besides looking foolish
Riddle Sideways: Q always looksstupid at the end of the show
Riddle Sideways: sometimes his mommy called him home for supper
Pema Pera: fun to see such different reactions . . .
Pema Pera: and yes, all recognizable :)
Riddle Sideways: But Q is a very model for PaB
Wol Euler raises an eyebrow
Riddle Sideways: we can think ourselves being Being
Riddle Sideways: just not very good at it yet
Wol Euler: :)
Scathach Rhiadra: :)
Riddle Sideways: born to it, but not mature enough... maybe
Samuel Okelly: here is like being part of the Q Continuum??
Riddle Sideways: yes
Fefonz Quan: back
Scathach Rhiadra: wb Fef
Riddle Sideways: the continuum gets together to discuss their playings
Fefonz Quan: i see i didn't miss my Q ;)
Wol Euler: wb fefonz
Tarmel Udimo: this SL and RL life does get confusing sometimes....
Samuel Okelly: do we discuss here or merely put forward our views?
Riddle Sideways: both and more
Pema Pera: we converse . . .
Pema Pera pondering playing as Being vs. playing as Q . . . .
Samuel Okelly: during the relatively short time I have been here, I have only witnessed "opinion" as opposed to actual exploration (this is not a criticism btw)
Fefonz Quan: well, i saw at least conversation in order to understand other opinions
Fefonz Quan: (and more come to think of it)
Pema Pera: the main explorations we do by ourselves, in the middle of our lives, through the 9-sec steps and whatever else we bring to bear ourselves
Pema Pera: and here we talk about what we find, and of course the talking can be part of the explorations
Fefonz Quan: (brb)
Pema Pera: I've learned a lot, comparing notes with others
Moon Fargis: yes or the dressing
Pema Pera: hearing about the experiences and interpretations thereof from others, and sharing those of myself
Riddle Sideways: ha, moon
Samuel Okelly: That I s precisely my point pema, the benfits for all who attend here appear personal not shared
Pema Pera: really? I am surprised, Sam, that is not how I feel it
Wol Euler: nor I
Scathach Rhiadra nods
Wol Euler: there is I think a commonality of benefit, of experience.
Moon Fargis: hmm sam well dont think of benefits
Tarmel Udimo: yes, a group of people I feel really connected to
Pema Pera: in fact, we often talk about how happy we are in sharing so much here . . .
Riddle Sideways: yes, a 'I am not alone' sharing
Wol Euler: we often report similar experiences and feelings and results. Not exactly the same.
Moon Fargis: more think of knowledge and awareness
Pema Pera: but perhaps you were expecting something different ?
Samuel Okelly: i am keen to stress this is NOT a criticism - far from it - but I am merely suggesting that if, for any given topic, I want to gain a range of views then the internet in general affords me that opportunity
Pema Pera: yes, I appreciate hearing your views, Sam; I am honestly curious what it is that strikes you as "not sharing" here
Moon Fargis: *meow meow*
Tarmel Udimo: and when in doubt there is always Moon's ever loving atempts to keep us happy and loved :-)
Samuel Okelly: it is simply the fact that i feel topics or issues are not explored here in the sense they are not "discussed" ... views are offered for the consideration of others and to do with as they see fit
Pema Pera: it may be cultural, Sam
Pema Pera: there is the "philosophers" culture of going head to head
Samuel Okelly: quite possibly :)
Pema Pera: and there is the culture here of showing each other in our cupped hands what nice little birds or flowers we recently came across
Pema Pera: before we set them free again
Moon Fargis: or more wich we never saw but start to see them slowly
Pema Pera: :)
Tarmel Udimo: :-)
Tarmel Udimo: beautifully put pema
Wol Euler: I'm curious about this, because it seems to me that we do nothing but discuss.
Tarmel Udimo: I agree
Wol Euler: which aspect of "discussion" is missing in your opinion, sam?
Scathach Rhiadra nods
Riddle Sideways: there have been many: "I am stuck..." dialogs
Moon Fargis: hmhm well this is sl i think our first way to comunicate is over chat
Riddle Sideways: there have been "am I going the rightt directions..."
Wol Euler nods to Riddle
Samuel Okelly: discussion for me involves exploration and here i see only submission (as valuable as that is in its own right)
Scathach Rhiadra: cn you give us some example?
Fefonz Quan: manytimes through discussion explortion come
Samuel Okelly: hi pila
Wol Euler: hello pila
Riddle Sideways: hi Pila
Pila Mulligan: greetings
Scathach Rhiadra: Hello Pila
Moon Fargis: hi ^^/
Pila Mulligan: just came from the salon at Kira's
Pema Pera: Hi Pila!
Fefonz Quan: (RL calls again, sorry, the stuffed cabagge is ready to eat :)
Wol Euler: :)
Scathach Rhiadra: :)
Wol Euler: bye fefonz, guten appetit
Moon Fargis: ^_^ *Nahm Nahm Nahm!* ^_^
Pila Mulligan: bye Fefonz
Scathach Rhiadra: bye Fefonz
Pema Pera: bye Fef!
Samuel Okelly: tc fef
Fefonz Quan: danke shein, wol :)
Moon Fargis: samuel: one question, do you know the bible ?
Riddle Sideways: there are explorations... when Moon looks through our pockets for candy
Samuel Okelly: yeah, i am aware of the book :)
Moon Fargis: candy? pockets? ! where?!
Pema Pera: [13:53] Samuel Okelly: discussion for me involves exploration and here i see only submission (as valuable as that is in its own right)
Pema Pera: [13:53] Scathach Rhiadra: cn you give us some example?
Riddle Sideways: ignoring moon is impossible
Pema Pera: I too would like to hear a concrete example, since I'm puzzled as well . . .
Moon Fargis: *gigles you said you got candy in your pokets hmhm ..do i have to tickle it out of you ?:)
Pema Pera: Sam?
Samuel Okelly: 10 people can all give an opinion and those 10 people can leave, informed with a greater understanding of the range of views that exist yet still no better equipped to resolve an issue
Pema Pera: what would "equipped" mean for you?
Pema Pera: beyond a deeper understanding of the issue, by walking around it and getting more familiar with its many aspects?
Samuel Okelly: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/equipped
Pema Pera: but Scathach asked for a concrete example, Sam
Pema Pera: not a definition of words
Pema Pera: can you give a specific example?
Samuel Okelly: pema you asked me for the defination
Pema Pera: yes, thank you!
Pema Pera: but I also said "for you"
Tarmel Udimo: actually pema asked mean for you
Pema Pera: what does it mean for you, not for the dictionary
Samuel Okelly: i think asking for a specific example is missing the point i am making
Moon Fargis: samuel: well when you know the bible.. didnt you noticed to that its full of it from things like this ?
Riddle Sideways: hmmmm, one example= discussion yesterday.
Riddle Sideways: I usually politally listen to NDE talk
Riddle Sideways: but it was related directly to OBE s
Riddle Sideways: that gave me hours of exploration lst night
Pema Pera: Perhaps the main characteristic of PaB is that we tend to deal with concrete examples of our life, and rarily with speculation and arguments about theoretical ideas that are divorced from actual life experience
Samuel Okelly: it was ironic that we were prevented from talking about "abortion" here not so long a very concrete example
Pema Pera wondering about the meaning of NDE and OBE
Riddle Sideways: Moon, stop staring at the pockets my hakama does not have.... I have NO cookies
Moon Fargis: yes and as 1 people can say its opinion 10 can understand it all different, but thats the way it works, we learn not by being told, we learn by mistakes and explorations
Moon Fargis: well not anymore *takes a lollipop out of his pocket*
Pema Pera: we don't like to talk about any political or economic or similar bone of contention in abstract ways, Sam, but if someone wants to talk about their own experience with, for example, abortion, then of course there is no reason not to
Tarmel Udimo: I agree
Scathach Rhiadra nods
Pema Pera: Have you been involved in an abortion?
Samuel Okelly: i would have thought so too
Pema Pera: given that you brought it up, if I may ask?
Samuel Okelly: it was not me who raised the topic but someone else
Samuel Okelly: the chat log will be documented
Tarmel Udimo: but you were upset that it wasn't explored
Samuel Okelly: i just can not remember the date
Samuel Okelly: not really tamel
Samuel Okelly: just surprised
Pema Pera: well, it is hard to argue about something that we are not currently involved in Sam, shall we return to the here and now?
Moon Fargis: ah brb
Pema Pera: we have enough to talk about, without reaching away into the past
Pema Pera: you mentioned discussions, and Scathach asked for a concrete example
Pema Pera: and you said that we were "prevented" from talking about that
Samuel Okelly: [14:00] Samuel Okelly: i think asking for a specific example is missing the point i am making
Pema Pera: can you remember what the "preventing" was?
Wol Euler: Just by the way, the chat log does document this. The subject has arisen three times. Once, you raised the topic; once, Ade did in your absence; once, I did in your absence.
Pila Mulligan: what is this subject, please?
Samuel Okelly: earlier i said that during the relatively short time I have been here, I have only witnessed "opinion" as opposed to actual exploration
Pema Pera: (unfortunately, I see that it is well past 2 pm already, how time flies, from Q to discussing discussions... I'm afraid I have to leave now -- I look forward to read the rest in the log)
Wol Euler: bye for now, pema. take care
Samuel Okelly: tc pem :)
Pema Pera: bye everybody!
Scathach Rhiadra: bye Pema:)
Tarmel Udimo: bye pema
Riddle Sideways: bye pema
Riddle Sideways: I too must go to RL stuff
Riddle Sideways: bye all
Wol Euler: bye riddle
Samuel Okelly: tc rid :)
Scathach Rhiadra: bye Riddle
Tarmel Udimo: bye riddle
Moon Fargis: rehi
Tarmel Udimo: I have to leave too, but before I do I have to say samuel, that in wanting to talk about an issue like abortion, perhaps you need to be more sensitive to what others may have experienced around that issue
Tarmel Udimo: and unless you wish to discuss it on a personal level i for one find it invasive being discussed just willy nilly
Samuel Okelly: with respect tam, you are missing the point i have made
Tarmel Udimo: I AM NOT SAMUEL
Samuel Okelly: k
Scathach Rhiadra: you seem to think we all miss the points you make, Sam
Tarmel Udimo: I think perhaps you have an agenda that is driving your need to discuss this, fair enough
Tarmel Udimo: but be open about it
Tarmel Udimo: don't use this place as an open forum to push your point of view
Tarmel Udimo: there are many places in SL and RL to do that
Samuel Okelly: k
Tarmel Udimo: no excuse me
Tarmel Udimo: sorry moon I have to go
Moon Fargis: ^^ ok
Wol Euler: 'night tarmel, take care.
Pila Mulligan: bye Tarmel
Scathach Rhiadra: hmm, would you like to answer the question I asked you a few sessions ago, ot do you have to rush off?
Samuel Okelly: [14:00] Samuel Okelly: i think asking for a specific example is missing the point i am making
Scathach Rhiadra: that is not the question i am referring to, Sam
Samuel Okelly: k
Scathach Rhiadra: the first time you came to a PaB session, you raised this question of where the ethical/moral values of non-theists originate... and have been raising it ever since, again and again and again, always the same topic.......
Scathach Rhiadra: do you see any value in what we are about in PaB other than using these discussions to pursue this theist v non-theist 'origin of ethics/morality' debate?
Samuel Okelly: like everyone scat, i do not enjoy conversing with ppl who are arrogant or disrespectful
Samuel Okelly: i feel tam was just now
Samuel Okelly: so maybe now is not a good time
Scathach Rhiadra: you tried to raise it again at the start of the session yesterday evening
Moon Fargis: samuel, please be aware, as you shout in the wood as it sounds back :)
Moon Fargis: (ok bad translation of that sayig)
Scathach Rhiadra: or you don't see anything in others that is not in yourself
Moon Fargis: the problem with this communication in internet samuel is that its basicly emotionless
Samuel Okelly: "[14:13] Tarmel Udimo: I think perhaps you have an agenda that is driving your need to discuss this, fair enough"
Moon Fargis: and emotions are aded by the people who reads it
Samuel Okelly: that was insulting
Moon Fargis: except you show your emotions with smilies
Wol Euler: samuel, she has left. we are still here.
Samuel Okelly: i will be reluctant to "raise" any topic in future for fear that i have "an agenda"
Pila Mulligan: how was it insulting, Sam?
Moon Fargis: hmm you fear to rise an topic?
Moon Fargis: or do you fear about the results and answers wich might come up that doesnt fit to yours?
Samuel Okelly: to suggest i have come with an agenda pila
Moon Fargis: to step forward sam, is to leave something behind
Samuel Okelly: also when i suggest that someone may have misunderstood the point i was making that shout back at me that i am wrong
Pila Mulligan: just guessing at what may have been going on here before I arrived, I appreciate how Sam seeks ways (here and elsewhere) to relate his strong religious beliefs to the views of people holding quite different opinios, and how that effort can involve friction and tension
Moon Fargis: ahh hmhm i see, sam in what religion are you ?
Pila Mulligan: I suspect Tarmel's point was not to emphasize her opinion that you may be here with an anti-abortion agenda
Samuel Okelly: i agree pila
Pila Mulligan: but to say that she wants you to be senstivie to how some topics may strike close to home for some people's personal expereince
Samuel Okelly: and i think that is insulting
Scathach Rhiadra: hmmm, I think you stated your agenda at the first session you attended ''Samuel Okelly: at the moment i am looking at "objective reality" and how this relates to the formation of ethics... Samuel Okelly: maybe you would like to comment on how you view "ethics" being established from a non-theistic viewpoint? Samuel Okelly: "No God = No Good"?
Wol Euler: you find it insulting that other people may have emotions?
Pila Mulligan: no, he thought Tarmel was seeing him as on a mission to attack abortion
Samuel Okelly: exactly pila
Samuel Okelly: " I think you stated your agenda at the first session"
Samuel Okelly: scat too for that matter
Wol Euler: well, to be honest sam, your profile gives that impression very strongly.
Moon Fargis: and, do you have an agenda samuel ?
Samuel Okelly: i do not deny or hide my views and my profile is open and honest
Wol Euler: laudable.
Samuel Okelly: it is NOT a hidden agenda
Pila Mulligan: i think Sam's intent is similar to that of most people here, but his starting point is more distant
Samuel Okelly: i view it as partonsingfor anybodyt to suggest otherwise
Wol Euler: tarmel was also open and honest about her opinion.
Scathach Rhiadra: but have you shown any interest in what we are about in PaB?, have you tried the 9-second practice?
Moon Fargis: ahh sunset
Moon Fargis: see my freinds, is that all meaningfull when you look at the sunset now ?
Wol Euler smiles
Scathach Rhiadra: :)
Samuel Okelly: scat, please understand that while i feel my views are being unfairly targeted by some like you, and more importantly misrepresented and disrespected i am reluctant to give further opinion for fear of further derision
Samuel Okelly: eg " I think you stated your agenda at the first session"
Moon Fargis: let me give you something sam
Scathach Rhiadra: yes, you continually raised the same subject for discussion, time after time, only your topic
Samuel Okelly: thank you moon
Fefonz Quan: i think the agenda might not be the main issue, we all have an agenda in a way
Fefonz Quan: but we try to agree hear about the way to discuss it
Samuel Okelly: "you continually raised the same subject for discussion" proof?
Wol Euler: oh sam, please.
Samuel Okelly: what am i to do?
Moon Fargis: watch the sunset:)
Moon Fargis: or sundown
Samuel Okelly: i do not respond to bullying tactics that hound a point ai disagree with
Moon Fargis: as its west :)
Samuel Okelly: i flatly refute the suggestion that i have "an agenda"
Wol Euler: accepted. done. next.
Moon Fargis: onigoko?
Fefonz Quan: my agenda hear is to duscuss what is reality
Fefonz Quan: and deal with it in ways of experiments and then sharing with others rsutls
Fefonz Quan: and hear others points of view
Samuel Okelly: furthermore, it should be noted that the targeted bullying approach by some will limit any further contributions i may make
Pila Mulligan: actually, ethics from a non-theistic viewpoint is a very interesting subject, but it needs an appropriate venue, and here it must share the stage with some other priorities
Scathach Rhiadra: yes, I could give you quotes from last night,
[2009/02/21 12:57] Aurora Kitaj: Sorry there, had to go an help someone to attend
[2009/02/21 12:57] Samuel Okelly: i see you are both followers of a bui see you are both followers or at least interested in the buddhist tradition?
[2009/02/21 12:57] Aurora Kitaj: and I'm supposed to be the guardian lol
[2009/02/21 12:57] Samuel Okelly: :)
[2009/02/21 12:57] Scathach Rhiadra: :)
[2009/02/21 12:57] Aurora Kitaj: Hello Scath
[2009/02/21 12:58] Yichard Muni: well, thanks :-)
[2009/02/21 12:58] Aurora Kitaj: Yichard, not sure whether you have attended Play as Being before
[2009/02/21 12:58] Scathach Rhiadra: yes, Samuel, but PaB is not Buddhist
[2009/02/21 12:58] Samuel Okelly: sure
[2009/02/21 12:58] Scathach Rhiadra: all traditions or none are welcome here
[2009/02/21 12:59] Yichard Muni: Yes sam, I am involved into Buddhism. although it is just for me a "best fitting personnal choice", I am open to all other spiritual paths
Wol Euler nods
Fefonz Quan: i've just read the whole discussion hear before saying something, and mostly i felt that other feeling but yors Sam were hurt too
Fefonz Quan: feelings but yours*
Samuel Okelly: ethics is a topic that interests me a great deal but it is aclear that some people do not wish to discuss it and rather than refrain from any conversation that arises, they seek to target personal insult at me
Pila Mulligan: so we are arguing insults?
Fefonz Quan: maybe they felt insulted too
Pila Mulligan: we are being Balkanized :)
Samuel Okelly: interestingly scat you do not quote the rest of he conversation that continued in an entirely different direction
Wol Euler: fill us in, sam.
Samuel Okelly: yet more ad hom insult
Wol Euler: what?
Wol Euler: that was a polite request for more information!
Scathach Rhiadra: yes, pulling it from the chat log requires a little work,
Wol Euler: "please samuel, do us the kindness to supply the words that Scath left out"
Moon Fargis: brb^^
Samuel Okelly: i do not have access to the conversation
Samuel Okelly: but the website will have the rest of the conversation
Samuel Okelly: suffice to say that it went in a different direction
Samuel Okelly: and i made my contributions as and when i felt appropriate
Scathach Rhiadra: [2009/02/21 12:59] Samuel Okelly: i was just wondering if anybody could enlighten me (no pun intended) as to whether or not the buddhist recognises an objective truth?
Scathach Rhiadra: a subject you have continually raised.
Samuel Okelly: continually?
Samuel Okelly: or once or twice?
Wol Euler: frequently, then.
Scathach Rhiadra nods
Samuel Okelly: so not "continuall" just frequently?
Samuel Okelly: how frequently?
Pila Mulligan: does it matter how often?
Wol Euler: sam, please.
Samuel Okelly: i think ity does pila
Fefonz Quan looking for a lawyer around...
Pila Mulligan: why?
Pila Mulligan: :)
Samuel Okelly: as the inferrence here is that i hve some hidden agenda
Pila Mulligan: or an interest in a topic :)
Samuel Okelly: beyond a passing interest
Pila Mulligan: so the present abrasion is the idea of an agenda
Samuel Okelly: i have acknowledged i have such an interest
Pila Mulligan: I agree that you do not have an agenda
Samuel Okelly: openly and honestly
Pila Mulligan: but I know you fomr previous places
Samuel Okelly: i make no secret of this
Samuel Okelly: i have other interests too
Pila Mulligan: it can be hard to see, Sam, because you have a strong foundation of beliefs :)
Samuel Okelly: i agree
Samuel Okelly: but i have respect
Samuel Okelly: i give it
Samuel Okelly: and i expect it in return
Pila Mulligan: thanks
Pila Mulligan: the water is already warm, then, so wait for it to cool
Fefonz Quan: and mostly people here are very respectful
Wol Euler: I agree.
Samuel Okelly: temp and scat have both been very insulting
Fefonz Quan: temp?
Pila Mulligan: Tarmel
Samuel Okelly: there comments were directed gainst me personaly
Pila Mulligan: sometimes the peices of the emotional jigsaw puzzle rub the wrong way
Fefonz Quan: well, she sounded offended herself, hence i guess the responses
Pila Mulligan: she too was rubbed :)
Scathach Rhiadra: sorry if you feel that way, I don't feeldisrespect for anyone:)
Wol Euler: mmhmm
Samuel Okelly: and if i said anything that was offensive then i am ready to hear what that was so i do not make the same mistake again
Pila Mulligan: there is the ad hominem defense as well as the ad hominem attack :)
Fefonz Quan: she explained something, and you just put it aside by saying "you miss my point"
Samuel Okelly: i agree pila
Samuel Okelly: THAT is precisely my point
Scathach Rhiadra: same as when I asked you for an example
Fefonz Quan: now i need explnation
Fefonz Quan: what is your point Sam?
Pila Mulligan: what Fefonz?
Samuel Okelly: if i am making a point and a response is given that suggests to me that a misinterpratation (for whatever reason) has been made then should i not say so?
Pila Mulligan: ahh, what is your Point Sam
Samuel Okelly: i will tell people if i think they have misunderstood me
Wol Euler: yes of course you may point out the error, but it would be useful to then go on to offer a further and better explanation.
Samuel Okelly: in such a situation it is insuilting to be told i am wrong
Fefonz Quan: no, she didn't say you misinterpret, she claimed about how you discuss those emotional things
Pila Mulligan: it is not an insult to be disagreed with, however :)
Pila Mulligan: a fine line perhaps
Samuel Okelly: how condescending to be told " you just put it aside by saying "you miss my point"
Samuel Okelly: i do not "just put it aside"
Fefonz Quan don't know what condencsending means...
Pila Mulligan: arrogant or feeling superior
Wol Euler: belittling, making someone seem inferior
Scathach Rhiadra: and you have never been guilty of it:)
Samuel Okelly: I view that as a fallacious irrelevancy as an error I have committed in no way justifies the failings of others
Pila Mulligan: actually, if I understand what Fefonz was saying, the was trying to explain why Tarmel sounded a little touchy
Wol Euler nods.
Fefonz Quan: Tarmel Udimo: I have to leave too, but before I do I have to say samuel, that in wanting to talk about an issue like abortion, perhaps you need to be more sensitive to what others may have experienced around that issue [14:12] Tarmel Udimo: and unless you wish to discuss it on a personal level i for one find it invasive being discussed just willy nilly [14:12] Samuel Okelly: with respect tam, you are missing the point i have made [14:12] Tarmel Udimo: I AM NOT SAMUEL
Fefonz Quan: well i didn't mean to sound errogant, my english i far from being so subtle
Pila Mulligan: Question, what do oyu suppose she meant by ' find it invasive '
Samuel Okelly: i explained to tam that i thought she had misunderstood the point i was making and she shouted back at me that she had not... now who is better placed to determine whether or not someone has misunderstood what i meant?
Fefonz Quan: tarmel may have missed your point samuel, but raised another that sounded important for her
Pila Mulligan: she was shouting that she was not addressing your point :)
Pila Mulligan: she was addressing HERS !
Wol Euler: she shouted because you were ignoring HER point, and that upset her.
Pila Mulligan: find it invasive
Pila Mulligan: mutually, it seems :)
Wol Euler: yep
Samuel Okelly: ahhhhhh
Pila Mulligan: :)
Pila Mulligan: haaaa
Fefonz Quan: yes Wol thanks
Samuel Okelly: so it seems we are BOTH talking at cross wires
Pila Mulligan: warm water cools
Samuel Okelly: we were both talking
Pila Mulligan: :)
Pila Mulligan: not listening
Wol Euler: mmhmm
Pila Mulligan: or not hearing perhpas
Samuel Okelly: it was my sincere and honest undersatning that she was correcting me about what i meant
Samuel Okelly: understanding
Fefonz Quan: and as far as i know tarmel, she tends to be most gentle and kind here
Pila Mulligan: :)
Wol Euler: I've never seen her shout before, in many months
Pila Mulligan: she was addressing the effect on her of the topic
Samuel Okelly: i am pleased to have been able to resolve that misunderstanding
Fefonz Quan nods
Pila Mulligan: now let's help Tarmel see that
Wol Euler smiles
Pila Mulligan: hi Tarmel, are you reading this log?
Wol Euler laughs and waves.
Pila Mulligan: Sam has somethign to say to you --
Pila Mulligan: Sam, ...
Samuel Okelly: and if you are reading this in your abscence TARMEL i apologise :)
Pila Mulligan: love previals
Wol Euler: spoken like a gentleman.
Scathach Rhiadra: :)
Samuel Okelly: i was writing that before you prompted me pila :) honest! :)
Pila Mulligan: I believe you
Fefonz Quan: aye to that Wol
Scathach Rhiadra: well, I must leave, but one small point, if I may...
Wol Euler: please
Fefonz Quan: you may
Samuel Okelly: if it refers to me scat id rather you didnt
Scathach Rhiadra: the word 'scat' means animal dung, not something people like to be called, so if you don't mind my name is Scath or Scátjh (more correctly:)
Samuel Okelly: np
Fefonz Quan: Bye scathach :)
Pila Mulligan: bye Scath
Wol Euler: bye scath, goodnight.
Samuel Okelly: tc scath :)
Scathach Rhiadra: bye all, see you all agin soon, namasté
Wol Euler: actually, it's midnight and I for one am very tired. Shall we close on this note of peace and reconciliation?
Fefonz Quan: _/!\_
Pila Mulligan: sure
Fefonz Quan: sure
Wol Euler: goodnight, gentlemen, and thank you for an interesting discussion.
Pila Mulligan: bye Wol, thank you
Samuel Okelly: thank you wol
Wol Euler: take care, everyone. Sleep well, be refreshed and happy tomorrow
Fefonz Quan: thank you Wol, a pleasure as always
Images 0 | ||
---|---|---|
No images to display in the gallery. |