2011.12.12 07:00 - Categorizing and Accuracy of Models

    Table of contents
    1. 1.  

    Version as of 02:22, 24 Nov 2024

    to this version.

    Return to Version archive.

    View current version

     

    The Guardian for this meeting was Zen Arado. The comments are by Zen Arado.

    Alfred Kelberry: zen san :)
    Zen Arado: oh Hi Alf :)
    Zen Arado: didn't see you there
    Alfred Kelberry: just popped in
    Zen Arado: ok nice of you
    Alfred Kelberry: you too, zen the painter :)
    Zen Arado: just a categoty
    Zen Arado: category
    Alfred Kelberry: fancy one, i'd say
    Zen Arado: I paint sometimes
    Zen Arado: not much atm
    Zen Arado: so not a ful toime professional
    Alfred Kelberry: still, a painter :P
    Zen Arado: don't do it for a living
    Zen Arado: well you apint too?
    Alfred Kelberry: nope
    Bleu Oleander: hi Zen, boxy
    Zen Arado: Hello Bleu :)
    Alfred Kelberry: bleu the artsy goddess :)
    Bleu Oleander: :)
    Alfred Kelberry: with a pretty voice
    Alfred Kelberry: ;)
    Bleu Oleander: awww, ty boxy :)
    Zen Arado: I don't know what 'I'am
    Bleu Oleander: hi Dash
    Alfred Kelberry: dash!
    Zen Arado: Hi Dash
    Dash Earthboy: hey y'all
    Zen Arado: I worked as an engineer in a power station
    Alfred Kelberry: how's your travelling, dash? or you're settled for now?
    Zen Arado: then I did a n Arts degree
    Bleu Oleander: what was your arts degree in?
    Bleu Oleander: painting?
    Zen Arado: sorry I'mn wandering off
    Dash Earthboy: Alf, i am back in my house in GA, but let's listen to what Zen is saying, okay?
    Alfred Kelberry: sure :)
    Zen Arado: a little art history but finished up dping philosophy
    Zen Arado: then an MA philosophy
    Alfred Kelberry: neat
    Zen Arado: so am 'I' an engineer, artist, philosopher ?
    Alfred Kelberry: *looks around*
    Zen Arado: or none of the above ?
    Zen Arado: :)
    Alfred Kelberry: a painter
    Bleu Oleander: can define ourselves in many ways
    Alfred Kelberry: for now
    Zen Arado: yeh exaclty Bleu
    Zen Arado: or not bother defining at all
    Bleu Oleander: can even define ourselves as no self
    Zen Arado: or stop constructing one
    Zen Arado: or see through the illusion
    Bleu Oleander: kinda impossible to stop constructing a self all together
    Zen Arado: or just not bother
    Zen Arado: :)
    Bleu Oleander: hi Arch
    Dash Earthboy: Zen do you identify with what you do for a living?
    Dash Earthboy: hey Arch
    Alfred Kelberry: archy :)
    Zen Arado: Hi Arch
    Zen Arado: no not at all Dash
    Zen Arado: I remember telling soeone here that I worked as an engineer
    Dash Earthboy: so you're comfortable with having "all of the above" as characteristics?
    Zen Arado: she immediatelt started talking about her brother who was an engineer and comparing him to me
    Alfred Kelberry: :)
    Zen Arado: I just see them as things I do or have done
    Archmage Atlantis: tch
    Zen Arado: but don't take an identity from them
    Dash Earthboy: well, my son is an engineer as is both bros in law
    Archmage Atlantis: labels be a bi
    Archmage Atlantis: oo
    Archmage Atlantis: fragrmenting speech
    Dash Earthboy: but none of them identify as "an engineer" for who they are, just what they do for a living
    Zen Arado: yeh...other people seem to want to put us in a category
    Zen Arado: it oversimplifies us
    Dash Earthboy: yah
    Alfred Kelberry: things change. you were an engeneer, but not anymore. you don't support this label going to work every day. you do wonderful paintings though. this is now, in this moment (at least for me) and i see you as an artsy soul and a painter :)
    Zen Arado: we areall unique
    Dash Earthboy: back in the day we used to call that "box" or "pigeonhole"
    Zen Arado: and don't even know what we can do ourselves
    Bleu Oleander: on the surface yes, but once you get to know someone, at for me, I don't see them in a category
    Dash Earthboy: or even "bag"
    Zen Arado: yeh
    Zen Arado: I probably do it too
    Zen Arado: it's handy
    Dash Earthboy: i don't
    --BELL--
    Archmage Atlantis: The doing of it catagorizing is not wrong or bad, it is only the failure to understand that it is a mechanism to orgranize that is not good
    Zen Arado: yes agree Arch
    Archmage Atlantis: ty zen
    Bleu Oleander: categories are preliminary and meant for a "fast read" of a situation, person, object etc. but deeper exploration and reflection is needed to discover the nuances
    Zen Arado: I tend to do it with people's personalities
    Zen Arado: yes Bleu
    Zen Arado: and allowing people freedom to be different than we expect
    Zen Arado: not assigning them a role..a fixed role
    Bleu Oleander: keep things fluid
    Alfred Kelberry: *nods to bleu*
    Bleu Oleander: constantly upgrading and revising
    Dash Earthboy: well, i was meaning categorizing by employment...not a general abstinence of any categorization which helps me organize
    Zen Arado: men do that with women a lot don't you think?
    Zen Arado: and vicde versa
    Dash Earthboy: yah
    Dash Earthboy: i've seen much of the vice versa :)
    Bleu Oleander: I think everyone does it to some extent
    Zen Arado: we do it to ourselves too?
    Bleu Oleander: yes
    Zen Arado: self defining
    Dash Earthboy: and the circle is complete :)
    Zen Arado: 'I'm not that type of person'
    Archmage Atlantis: b4 I came to this meeting, I looked something up that seemed to applay
    Archmage Atlantis: ca·thar·sis A release of emotional tension, as after an overwhelming experience, that restores or refreshes the spirit. New Latin, from Greek katharsis, from kathairein, to purge, from katharos, pure
    Bleu Oleander: hi Eliza
    Zen Arado: Morning Eliza
    Dash Earthboy: hey Eliza
    Alfred Kelberry: eliza! :)
    Eliza Madrigal: Hi everyone
    Zen Arado: we aretalking about defining and categorizing ourselves and others
    Eliza Madrigal: interesting topic!
    Zen Arado: allowing purification
    Bleu Oleander: how do you mean "purification"?
    Zen Arado: I noticed myself telling others I don't like this time of year
    Zen Arado: but is it true or just a story I tell myself?
    Bleu Oleander: a lot of expectations this time of year
    Archmage Atlantis: Zen, yes.....the winter of our discontent
    Eliza Madrigal: yes
    Zen Arado: ha yes Arch
    Bleu Oleander: can always shift your perspective though
    Zen Arado: I always seem to break up with someone this time of year too
    Archmage Atlantis: at least at that time we as beings have been closer to this pole known as north
    Zen Arado: readthat that is common
    Dash Earthboy: i don't see S.A.D. as that mysterious
    Bleu Oleander: I try not to say things to myself that begin with "I always" or "I never"
    Zen Arado: good plan Bleu !!
    Bleu Oleander: :)
    Eliza Madrigal: nods
    Zen Arado: cos we beieve our self definitions so often
    Zen Arado: and they become self fulfilling
    Eliza Madrigal: many take a while to adjust to earlier nightfall, and some 'evaluate' their lives leading to New Years resolutions, reflect on the year behind... threshold time
    Eliza Madrigal: but that can be 'positive'
    Bleu Oleander: can be a new beginning
    Zen Arado: maybe sSAD is an illusion Dash?
    Eliza Madrigal: yes, fresh start
    Archmage Atlantis: I have a conundrum then, for you Bleu......I will never see things as always the same, and I will always see things as not being never
    Zen Arado: but thereis scientific evidence I think?
    Bleu Oleander: :) Arch
    Bleu Oleander: I didn't say always or never ... only that I try
    Zen Arado: always or never never happens :)
    Zen Arado: another conundrum :)
    Bleu Oleander: when I hear always or never it triggers me to stop and listen to myself and look more closely at what I'm saying
    Zen Arado: yeh absolutes are dangerous
    Bleu Oleander: often not really meaning always or never
    Zen Arado: reality is ever shifting and changing
    Zen Arado: resists attempts to freeze it into place
    Eliza Madrigal: it is a 'couples therapy' tool also, not defaulting to always or never, because surely one isn't 'always' inconsiderate/obtuse/etc. lol
    Zen Arado: yes
    Bleu Oleander: :)
    Zen Arado: funny how 'always and never' come up in arguments
    Bleu Oleander: except for husbands hehe
    Eliza Madrigal: :)
    Eliza Madrigal: but then my kids do roll their eyes when I take out my 'there is a tendency toward...' language,
    Zen Arado: 'you never' etc
    Bleu Oleander: ha!
    Eliza Madrigal: :)
    Archmage Atlantis: children are our future
    Zen Arado: ha ha a sneakier version
    --BELL--
    Bleu Oleander: you are your future
    Archmage Atlantis: argh, did I really say that?
    Zen Arado: everyone and everything is our future
    Eliza Madrigal: 'we are the ones we've been waiting for'
    Dash Earthboy: thus begins the we-zing
    Archmage Atlantis: In Principle I agree Zen
    Zen Arado: wheezes
    Dash Earthboy: yep
    Zen Arado: but it doesn't exist
    Archmage Atlantis: In reality, an animal came to our house to be beloveed
    Dash Earthboy: minds can be healthier without generalization and denial
    Zen Arado: yeh just sensing the present moment
    Archmage Atlantis: And I have no idea how that will turn out
    Zen Arado: trying to do that
    Dash Earthboy: Arch in music we call that improv
    Zen Arado: my mind is always looking for general rules
    Zen Arado: form what has happened in the past
    Zen Arado: a friend with Aspergers always told me off for generalizing
    Eliza Madrigal: it does seem to be important to have general outlines and from that respond within a moment/unique context
    Zen Arado: generalizing addictiokn:)
    Eliza Madrigal: for instance, in an argument of you vs you, a 'we' may be a bonding frame
    Zen Arado: but every moment is new and fresh
    Bleu Oleander: the past was once that way also
    Dash Earthboy: Zen did your Aspergers friend catch you saying "always"? :)
    Bleu Oleander: but we beat it into submission hehe
    Eliza Madrigal: :))
    Archmage Atlantis: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iT88jBAoVIM
    Zen Arado: no...just deriving genearl rules when she wanted to be specific to her
    Zen Arado: her situation
    Eliza Madrigal: defaulting to abstract?
    Zen Arado: I avoid always and never too
    Dash Earthboy: listen to yourself sometime Zen :)
    Zen Arado: ha that is part of it too Eliza
    Zen Arado: it is a philosopher thing too
    Dash Earthboy: Zen Arado: a friend with Aspergers always told me off for generalizing
    Zen Arado: that's what philosophers do
    Eliza Madrigal: hide in the abstract forest
    Zen Arado: well not intended
    Zen Arado: it is trying to understand life
    Zen Arado: clarify it
    Eliza Madrigal nods and what is common ground?
    Dash Earthboy: i am amused often by the "good intentions" excuse
    Zen Arado: see through the mental fog
    Zen Arado: see through faulty logic we use
    Archmage Atlantis: trying to understand = good.......thinking one understands = bad
    Zen Arado: hilosophic conclusins are provisional
    Zen Arado: but I don't do much of that nowadays
    Dash Earthboy: many communications problems can be thwarted by intentionally being accurate in what is said
    Eliza Madrigal: hidden logic
    Zen Arado: what is accurate?
    Eliza Madrigal: it sort of depends on one's point... whether to relate or to 'teach' ?
    Zen Arado: my accurate might not be someone elses
    Bleu Oleander: right
    Zen Arado: I can't say anything now
    Dash Earthboy: oh crap
    Bleu Oleander: however there are many accurates we agree to agree on
    Eliza Madrigal: I like collaborative models... so if not 'competitive' there is learning while relating... and what can emerge is larger than egos
    Eliza Madrigal: or more flexible anyway, chance of that
    Zen Arado: agree Eliza
    Zen Arado: collaborative is more in vogue nowadays I think
    Eliza Madrigal: and then people can absorb/allow for others' quirks... like my saying 'yes' all the time, lol
    Zen Arado: od days strong individualism more admired
    --BELL--
    Dash Earthboy: to challenge the concept of "accurate" is itself a divisive, not collaborative, action...i believe some people like to recreate the Tower of Babel at every opportunity, more out of ego than out of earnest curiosity
    Bleu Oleander: wish I could say collaborative and US congress in same sentence hehe
    Eliza Madrigal giggles Bleu
    Archmage Atlantis: After the ads
    Archmage Atlantis: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amcGI...w&feature=fvst
    Bleu Oleander: sometimes "accurates" need to be challenged ...
    Zen Arado: but if I say my version is accurate and everyone else is wrong...should I tell peole that?
    Eliza Madrigal: pretty song, Arch, ty... old tune...
    Archmage Atlantis: I a perfect world, Yes Zen
    Bleu Oleander: how change happens
    Archmage Atlantis: "In a"
    Zen Arado: nice song Arch
    Zen Arado: nice looking woman
    Archmage Atlantis: You would not be condemned in a perfect world for having a vision that is different
    Eliza Madrigal: isn't there something to be said for 'presence' of a matter... that people aren't just creatures of 'accuracy' but of presence...?
    Eliza Madrigal: of intention and impartation?
    Bleu Oleander: accuracy in the sense of understanding?
    Eliza Madrigal: we have hundreds of teachers in life, maybe one or two that 'affect' us deeply
    Eliza Madrigal: and so accuracy matters but maybe not the heart of things?
    Zen Arado: for functinal purposes the most accurate model is used
    Archmage Atlantis: Yes., Eliza...thought thati a bit "touchy-feely" for us right brainers
    Eliza Madrigal: :)
    Archmage Atlantis: Or is it left brainers
    Eliza Madrigal: haha
    Archmage Atlantis: I forger
    Dash Earthboy: what is an accurate model, Zen?
    Zen Arado: in a work context the one that works best
    Bleu Oleander: how are we to be in the world? what works best :)
    Dash Earthboy: so there is a context in which my use of "accurate" could be used?
    Eliza Madrigal: psychology suggests 'left' arch, but since I knew what you meant it was okay not to pick it apart
    Bleu Oleander: constantly revised throughout life
    Zen Arado: oh yes Dash
    Dash Earthboy: thanks Bleu
    Dash Earthboy: yet you challenged it Zen
    Zen Arado: perhaps that's where confusion arises...different contexts
    Eliza Madrigal: in this context.. if writing a paper it would need to be corrected perhaps
    Eliza Madrigal: yes
    Zen Arado: I wa thinking of a woder context
    Zen Arado: one of versions of reality
    Zen Arado: wider
    Dash Earthboy: look at my original statement about "accuracy" intentionality
    Eliza Madrigal would need someone to go behind constantly editing and cleaning
    Archmage Atlantis: Am I allowed to be bi-brainal, sisters?
    Bleu Oleander: :)
    Eliza Madrigal: yes Arch :)
    Archmage Atlantis: ty
    Eliza Madrigal: :))
    Eliza Madrigal: this is pretty fun actually, but I have to go
    Bleu Oleander: me too
    Dash Earthboy: guess i think "sincerity" is the most important "good intention"
    Bleu Oleander: take care all :)
    Archmage Atlantis: First a prayer
    Dash Earthboy: pax et bonum y'all
    Archmage Atlantis: In the force of all creation
    Archmage Atlantis: I ask that what we see
    Archmage Atlantis: is given to all
    Zen Arado: thereis a big difference between accuracy if aiming a rifle and accuracy of descriptions of reality is all
    Zen Arado: bye Dash :)
    Archmage Atlantis: with the power to accept
    Archmage Atlantis: and believe
    Archmage Atlantis: blessings and namaste
    Zen Arado: ByeBoeu ByeEliza
    Zen Arado: namaste
    Zen Arado: bye Arch
    Eliza Madrigal: thanks everyone, Namaste'. Zen... it is perhaps whether aggression is present sometimes ...? ah, couldn't keep up with everything
    Eliza Madrigal: so forgive me if I added a new string element here :))
    Eliza Madrigal: fun conversation
    Zen Arado: np
    Eliza Madrigal: bye for now

    Powered by MindTouch Core