2008.08.21 19:00 - The Song of "Just Imagine"

Pia Iger was the guardian and she is waiting for fellow guardians to upload the log for her..."Here I am Pia"...Adams

Adams Rubble is posting this part of the log for Pia with few comments. I came in on an ongoing conversation between Mongo, Threedee, Adelene and Doug. Tomo, Kojiro and Navi arrived right after me.

Mongo McGinnis: whats up
Mongo McGinnis: havent been here in a while
Adelene Dawner feels like being a smartass... "Good question... what is 'up'?"
Adelene Dawner: ^.^
Mongo McGinnis: just an iinocent question
MystiTool HUD 1.0.21-freebie: Entering chat range: doug Sosa (17m)
Kojiro Eretz: Hi all!
Adams Rubble: Hello Adelini, Mongo, Kojiro, Threedee Doug Tomo :)
Threedee Shepherd: nothing unusual, or is it "nothing is unusual"?
Threedee Shepherd: hello all
doug Sosa: :)
Kojiro Eretz: So..... quiet.....
Adams Rubble: shhhh
Adams Rubble: :)
Kojiro Eretz: XD
Mongo McGinnis: does pema pera come here anymore
Adams Rubble: yes, often
Threedee Shepherd: of course, often
Mongo McGinnis: used to him
Mongo McGinnis: whAT IS THE DISCUSSION
doug Sosa: he is in kyoto, so lets see. what time breakfast?
Mongo McGinnis: soory didnt meant o shout
Mongo McGinnis: that explains it nyc or japan
Threedee Shepherd: the discussiono "tries" to start with us reporting about our 9-sec practice experiences, and then actually goes almost anywhere about the nature of reality
Kojiro Eretz: I tried that 9 second meditation once or twice today ( im new :P)
Threedee Shepherd: 4 times a day!!

Stevenaia appeared next followed by Pia

Kojiro Eretz: one image came to mind
Kojiro Eretz: A little anime girl saying hi... thats about it.
Threedee Shepherd: was she familiar?
Adams Rubble: Hi Steve, hi Pia :)
Kojiro Eretz: No not really.
Threedee Shepherd: Hi Steve, Pia
doug Sosa: hi pia
Kojiro Eretz: Hi :D
stevenaia Michinaga: hello, welcome back Kojiro
Kojiro Eretz: Thank you ^^
Mongo McGinnis: i am already getting critized for being here
Pia Iger: Hi, everyone,
Mongo McGinnis: hi
Adams Rubble: Mongo?
doug Sosa: criticized?
Mongo McGinnis: adams
Adams Rubble: criticized?
Threedee Shepherd: Mongo, not by us, I hope, seriously :)
Mongo McGinnis: yes you guys are weird according rto my friend and family
Adams Rubble: Ah
Adams Rubble: Say hi for us :)
Mongo McGinnis: mets win
Mongo McGinnis: that my ;ife
Mongo McGinnis: mets sweep atalantq braves
Threedee Shepherd: What is weird about us?
stevenaia Michinaga: ..says the lion
Adams Rubble: hehe

Keith Joined us

Mongo McGinnis: no idea just my wife came in and said mets sweep the atlanta braves
Adams Rubble: Hllo Keith :)
Threedee Shepherd: This lion is not weird, because it is not real, and how can unreal things even BE, let alone be real
Keith Sporg: hi how are you?
Threedee Shepherd: Keith, you have dropped in on an ongoing discussion group that talks about the nature of reality
Threedee Shepherd: Hello
Mongo McGinnis: hi
Mongo McGinnis: havent been here in a while
Pia Iger: Keith is born today.
Mongo McGinnis: whats the discussion
Keith Sporg: that sounds interesting
Kojiro Eretz: Happy birthday Keith!
Keith Sporg: yes im new to this game
Threedee Shepherd: no topic has emerged at this session, yet
Keith Sporg: thanks :-)
Mongo McGinnis: keith rules haapy birthday
Keith Sporg: yall are a lot nicer than the last people I was aroud
Keith Sporg: yes I do!! yayy
Keith Sporg: but I really want to make some new friends
doug Sosa: we are pretty friendly, spend time talking about how we experience the world in short bursts of meditation.
Keith Sporg: sounds good to me
Keith Sporg: its relaxing
Keith Sporg: that is wut i need in my life right now
stevenaia Michinaga: http://playasbeing.wik.is/Informatio..._in_a_Nutshell
doug Sosa: keith, do you know how to sit on the cushion?
Threedee Shepherd: doug, that is a really useful and informative description :)
Mongo McGinnis: i am a big zen buddhist for over 30 years
Keith Sporg: nope no idea
Keith Sporg: lemme try
Keith Sporg: ok there
doug Sosa: beautiful!
Threedee Shepherd: Mongo, which "school"
Keith Sporg: does anyone here want to add me as a friend and help me out when I could use it?
Mongo McGinnis: zen and rinzai
Mongo McGinnis: Mountains and rivers in mt tremper
doug Sosa: sure but i don't yet know how to do that.
Keith Sporg: do whats?add friends?
doug Sosa: yep.
doug Sosa: hey i got it.
Mongo McGinnis: soto and rinzai
Keith Sporg: hey i did too :-)
Threedee Shepherd: Mongo, is there a "koan group" in SL?
Mongo McGinnis: i like shugen
Mongo McGinnis: not sure
Pia Iger: (thanks, fellow guardians, Pia's internet is slow today. Thanks for your help of hosting.)
Pia Iger: but I am listening. just type slow.
Mongo McGinnis: i like myotai the best but she broke off MRO
doug Sosa: here we do short 9 second meditations during the day and then report on them here, whre we meet 4 times a day. but most ofcourse don't come to all sessions.
Keith Sporg: i set this as my home.yall all are very kind.I am going to make some money and I will be back
Adams Rubble: Hello Navi :)
Threedee Shepherd: Come again Keith
doug Sosa: how do you make money?
Kojiro Eretz: Good luck with the money earning.
doug Sosa: guess we'll have to wait and find out.
Mongo McGinnis: computers
Kojiro Eretz: It's hard to make money in SL if you don't have ingame knowledge about building things :/
doug Sosa: I've none.
Mongo McGinnis: i make money by making cinnections and kearning new skills
Mongo McGinnis: but mostly i am here for the buddhism and zen
Kojiro Eretz: I originally came on to meet other people who like anime ...but.....
doug Sosa: what do you hope for from these two?
Kojiro Eretz: Most of the people I found were... immature about things...
doug Sosa: oh we all got mature and are now hopingto be immature again.
Adams Rubble: :)
Kojiro Eretz: XD
Threedee Shepherd: Lately in my 9-sec, my most common observation is of "everything" in my field of view, for which this is no one term, and thus, no word, even though each of the parts "has" a word..
Threedee Shepherd: *there is
doug Sosa: do you have a sense of what is beyond the field of view? I find that is part of it.
Mongo McGinnis: this is who iam fom begiinig to end imagine a two year talking about emptiness
Threedee Shepherd: No doug, I do not
stevenaia Michinaga: do you sense themes over time like this, my experiences are generally unique
doug Sosa: that is intriguing. is it like a room with no outside?

Pema Joins Us

Adams Rubble: Hi Pema :)
Pema Pera: Hi everybody!
Kojiro Eretz: Hi! :D
Mongo McGinnis: hi pema
Threedee Shepherd: Sometimes I am outside and see mountains and trees, 45 minutes, I saw the long sidewalk I was on as if it were a long path in a filed of houses and green.
Threedee Shepherd: Ho i Pema
Threedee Shepherd: *field
doug Sosa: :)
Threedee Shepherd: 45 minutes ago, I meant to say
Threedee Shepherd: <aside> this keyboard MUST be switching letters around, it can't be me :(
Adams Rubble: :)
Kojiro Eretz: Maybe it needs to be cleaned?
Mongo McGinnis: new people here since i was here you have a good group pema
Pema Pera: Thanks, Mongo, and great seeing you again -- has been a while!
Pema Pera: last time was in the old tea house perhaps?
Mongo McGinnis: yes
Kojiro Eretz: Is it strange not to have any speratic thoughts during these 9 second meditation periods?
Threedee Shepherd: Doug, you said "what is beyond the field of view? I find that is part of it." Can you say more about "whatr is beyond" in your experience?
doug Sosa: tuna being grilled gotta rescue it. but one last thought Three.
Threedee Shepherd: No, Kojoiro, that happens for me often.
doug Sosa: i experience what i can see as in a container of effortless being.
Kojiro Eretz: Ah, ok then.

Avastu arrives as Doug departs

doug Sosa: bye.. (as the smoke comes in)..
Adams Rubble: Hello Avastu :)
Threedee Shepherd: Evening Avastu
Pema Pera: Hi Avastu!
Avastu Maruti: hello my friends
Kojiro Eretz: Hi there :D
Mongo McGinnis: hi whats up
Pema Pera: Thank you, Pia, for helping us to get organized with the excerpt project!
Pema Pera: Mongo, we have had 500 or so sessions now
Pema Pera: and we're trying to get some of the most fun parts selected
Pia Iger: You're welcome. Just IMed Syl, we got some foundations done.
Pema Pera: a very hard task of course
Pema Pera: and very ambiguous
Pema Pera: everyone has different preferences
Pema Pera: but together we can make a mashup, a collection
Mongo McGinnis: what is up at the present moment no offense just wonderindering what people are thinking right now
Kojiro Eretz: ... Trying to think of... what to think.....
Pia Iger needs to keep poking fellow guardians for the project.
Mongo McGinnis: non thinking??? or something else
stevenaia Michinaga: it;s like walking into the middle of a story, it takes a moment to get up to speed
Threedee Shepherd: ...I apologize in advance for this Mongo: What I thought when you typed that is that you keep asking that question and not offering a topic.
Mongo McGinnis: havent been here for a while just wondering what we have been up to or discussing
Threedee Shepherd: OK, my sense is that we have only one topic, BEING, and that we spiral and eddy around it in many ways, not trying to "get" anywhere in particular.
Mongo McGinnis: soory talk and i will add in when i have something to say
Adams Rubble: Sorry sleep overtaking. bye everyone :)
Pema Pera: bye Adams
Kojiro Eretz: G night Adams

Adams left here prematurely

Threedee Shepherd: G'night Adams
Mongo McGinnis: good night adams
Pema Pera: well, Mongo, we do many things: we playfully chat about life on all kind of levels, and indeed we try to spiral into the notion of Being
Pema Pera: and it all rests on the exploration, every 15 minutes of the 9-sec practice
Pema Pera: have you tried it?
Pema Pera: to drop everything for 9 seconds?
Mongo McGinnis: ok sounds ggod i will try for a week
Pema Pera: wonderful! I look forward to hearing what you find
Pema Pera: just a few hours a day is fine, say ten times a day -- or longer, some of us do it the whole day
Pema Pera: a few dozen times or more
Pema Pera: and it doesn't have to be precisely every 15 minutes either
Pema Pera: some like regularity
Mongo McGinnis: ok that is what i will do tomorrow
Pema Pera: some prefer more spontaneity
Kojiro Eretz: Is it ok to not be able to meditate every 15 minutes? I can't exactly stop like that when im working. :/
stevenaia Michinaga: I must go, thank you all
Threedee Shepherd: Pema, sometimes I have the sense that the 9-sec takes me, not me it, and I go with it.
stevenaia Michinaga: see you soon
Mongo McGinnis: i tend to get focuesd and ignore everything else kind of focused that way
Pema Pera: bye Steve!
Threedee Shepherd: night Steve
Avastu Maruti: good bye my friend
Kojiro Eretz: See ya
Pema Pera: yes, 3D !!
Pia Iger: sure, Kojiro. no need to be strict about time.
Mongo McGinnis: steve gnight
Pema Pera: Korjiro, ah, the interesting question is wht is means to "stop" :-)
Kojiro Eretz: Ok cool ^_^;;
Pema Pera: there are many ways
Kojiro Eretz: Oh?
Pema Pera: at first good to do it only when you are only and relaxed
Pema Pera: but after some practice you can even do it when you are talking with someone
Pema Pera: Doug described that very nicely recently
Pema Pera: for 9 sec you set aside your normal reactions and judgments
Pema Pera: and you just listen
Pema Pera: and when someone asks a question you just answer
Pema Pera: "just" without adding anything
Kojiro Eretz: What if you are listening most of the time like if it was just normal?
Pema Pera: Doug reported how different the conversation became for him . . . .
Pema Pera: what do you mean, Kojiro, can you say more?
Kojiro Eretz: Well... most of the time when im with people... I mostly just listen.
Pema Pera: yes, but there may be deeper layers of "just"
Pema Pera: if you take a few seconds, we say 9, but that's just roughly, and you take a few deeper breaths and relax more, you may find a deeper "just"
Pema Pera: "just a little deeper :-)"
Pema Pera: try it, you'll like it!
Kojiro Eretz: Heh ^_^
Pema Pera: the first time may not be so different, but 20 times a day, then after a few days, by the 70th time, it may be *quite* different
Pema Pera: but only you can tell, if you try it
Pema Pera: and let us know what happened -- if nothing happens, that will be interesting too!
Pema Pera wondering about a PaB song "just a little deeper" . . . . .
Kojiro Eretz: I've been trying to remember to meditate like that since my discovery of this place last night
Mongo McGinnis: i tend to fucus on a longerschdile than a few mins
Threedee Shepherd: Pema, I find I still have a reflex reaction that "jumps" when I observe deeply and become aware of "more", which takes me out of it. Practice, I guess...
Pema Pera: yes!
Pema Pera: observing the jumping may be a fun move, for example
Pema Pera: who is observing the you that jumps?
Avastu Maruti smiles
Threedee Shepherd: :)
Pia Iger: actually i just realized all 9 secs I have been done, makes me feel very "good" or "peaceful". I don't know what word to use. anyway the feeling is very comforting.
Pema Pera: from the beginning, Pia?
Mongo McGinnis: i find what i am doing is what iam doing that is not readly changed in a few mins
Pia Iger: more and more clearly like this, Pema
Pema Pera: no expectations needed, Mongo, they would just get in the way
Pema Pera: and yes, combining it with longer practice is great
Pia Iger: I find I can get happiness righ away, once I do 9sec anyway
Pema Pera: then the 9-secs can provide the continuity between the longer ones
Pema Pera: very glad to hear that, Pia!
Pema Pera: I have also found something similar, that the 9-secs become more and more powerful the longer you practice
Pema Pera: and the quality of "power" changes
Pia Iger: It's like you already have happiness on hand, as long as you look at it.
Pema Pera: becomes more subtle
Pema Pera: yes, very much so!
Pema Pera: like ground water welling up
Threedee Shepherd: :)
Pema Pera: a lamp has power to shine, but opening the window requires far less power and gives much more light
Pema Pera: subtle power is almost no power
Kojiro Eretz: You go into the meditation with no expectations and feel happy the more you do it.. but then wouldn't you get the expectation of feeling happy when you do it more?
Pema Pera: and no power at all is the best :)
Pema Pera: that's the danger, yes
Pema Pera: and then you have to drop that
Pema Pera: but no rush!
Threedee Shepherd: Put another way perhaps, Peme, no power is absolute power
Pema Pera: might as well enjoy each stage for a while
Pema Pera: yes, 3D, it is all contextual
Pema Pera: and not-doing means no-power
Pema Pera: and there are ten thousands ways of deepening not-doing
Pema Pera: and no-power
Pema Pera: I've learned quite a few in the few months of PaB!
Pema Pera: almost daily sometimes
Pia Iger: care to give an example?
Pema Pera: Each time when I watch myself "doing" something in/for Pab, from talking in a meeting, to organizing, to talking off line to individuals, and so on, I see myself doing it by stepping aside, and by letting *something* do it -- and then when I look more closely I see something still remaining trying to do. And seeing it, I can then drop that too, as well as I can. And more and more, seeing is dropping, already
Threedee Shepherd: "meaningful not-doing" is the apparent paradox that drives doing.
Pema Pera: As for a concrete example: trying to help somebody by pointing something out -- and then realizing that the "helping" was to much. Then I reformulate the pointing out, and it becomes more pure, automatically
Pema Pera: apparent paradox -- indeed!
Mongo McGinnis: obviously every one haass diff cercumstances
Pema Pera: Even more concrete: say that I think somebody does somethign a bit awkard, and I want to point that out. In the past (like, a week ago, hehe) I would have tried to gently point out the problem -- but more and more I learn to instead gently point to the more positive qualities, how they can be exercised more purely, while saying less or nothing about the problem -- is that concrete enough, Pia?
Pia Iger: very. I experinced quite chanllenge of how point out other's issues.
Pia Iger: Your example do give me insight of how to handle this kind of situations better.
Mongo McGinnis: i was hoping others would talk more to get in sync with what yo uwere talking about but this is good
Pia Iger: or easily.
Pema Pera: and one's one issues, too, Pia!
Kojiro Eretz: I... tend to listen untill a good point comes into mind.
Pema Pera: if I may add one footnote
Pema Pera: telling someone they did something wrong has the grave danger or reifying what they did
Pia Iger: no doubt.
Pema Pera: instead of someone who once drops something, the person gets labeled as clumsy, say
Pema Pera: for the person him/her-self too
Adelene Dawner: mmmmm.
Kojiro Eretz: Hmm
Pema Pera: instead of lying, someone becomes a lier
Pema Pera: instead of stealing, a thief
Pema Pera: and the attempt to correct can instead put it in stone
Pema Pera: having the opposite effect
Threedee Shepherd: :)
Pia Iger: but at the same time, we still need to do something, not just let them be. so the questions is how?
Kojiro Eretz: One person just does an action but it takes another person to define the first person's character.
Threedee Shepherd: Why do we have to, Pia?
Mongo McGinnis: sorry have to do my worry beads tonight see tmorrrow
Kojiro Eretz: G night Mongo
Threedee Shepherd: bye Mongo
Avastu Maruti: good bye my friend
Kojiro Eretz: Nice meeting you
Pema Pera: Suzuki roshi had a great way, Pia: in a circle of people who were cleaning their tea bowl, he corrected a person who already did it perfectly; and the others realized that they could improve their way, without their defense mechanism being triggered by the master scolding :-)
Pema Pera: by Mongo!
Pia Iger: so he is still doing the teaching, just not in scolding way. That is his skill.
Pema Pera: yes!
Pema Pera: And 3D's question is a great one : do we have to?
Pema Pera: yes and no
Pema Pera: can't just let it go, that would be irresponsidble too
Pema Pera: non-responding
Pia Iger: right.
Pema Pera: we have to respond, but how?
Pema Pera: not-doing
Pema Pera: but how?
Pema Pera: we learn, and we help each other learning, right here, every day!
Threedee Shepherd: Pema, If iI am not asked to respond, or "hired" to, or actually parenting, why must I respond?
Pema Pera: we all respond
Pema Pera: in a group
Pema Pera: if only by silence
Pia Iger: We are learning here by sharing each one's perspetive.
Pema Pera: if we see one of us in the group in distress, we respond, we each respond, I think
Threedee Shepherd: So, you are saying the responsibility to respond is contextual. When we gather in a group, that sets up contextual *expectations*?
Pema Pera: perhaps more subtle, or more natural than that
Pema Pera: walking in a crowd, we don't collide wiht others normally
Pema Pera: which means we respond to ALL the people that we encounter
Pema Pera: hundreds of them in a few seconds
Threedee Shepherd: I can respond, "I see your distress" an/or try to give advice. It's doing the latter that I am questioning.
Pema Pera: isn't that amazing?!?
Pema Pera: yes, that would be the direct way
Pema Pera: there are far more subtle ways
Pema Pera: a smile
Pema Pera: a nod
Pema Pera: a kind question
Pema Pera: perhaps hours later
Pema Pera: an IM
Pema Pera: or nothing!
Kojiro Eretz: Im sorry.. I stepped away from my computer for a moment
Kojiro Eretz: Did i miss much?
Pema Pera: not commenting or trying to help can also be a form of respect
Pema Pera: do you have your local chat window up, Kojiro?
Kojiro Eretz: um... no
Threedee Shepherd: agreed. The subtle ways are not *advice*, but rather an invitation.
Pema Pera: if so you can read the whole previous dialogue
Kojiro Eretz: Ah... ok :P
Pema Pera: sort-of-advice perhaps, through example, but labeling it that way is already a bit tricky
Pema Pera: may I tell another Suzuki story?
Pema Pera: sorry to talk so much . . . . .
Threedee Shepherd: please do
Pema Pera: He opened his zen center in a rough part of downtown San Francisco
Pema Pera: some bad boys walked up to him, threateningly
Pema Pera: one started talking, ready to jump on him
Pema Pera: and asked him in a sneering way why he carried a stick
Pema Pera: Suzuki smiled
Pema Pera: slowly took his stick
Pema Pera: and softly hit the bad guy on his shoulder, saying
Pema Pera: "I have the stick to hit people like you guys"
Pema Pera: they all laughed
Pema Pera: and become good friends
Pema Pera: so that was a way of giving advice, without confrontation or trying to "correct"
Avastu Maruti gave you Gandhi Stick by Indusgeeks..
Threedee Shepherd: In rather pragmatic terms, that is characterized as a "teachable moment"
Pema Pera: yes
Pema Pera: in natural terms: it was all one flow
Pema Pera: Suzuki Being
Pema Pera: not premeditated at all
Pema Pera: not afraid of the bad guys
Threedee Shepherd: yes, there was/is a naturalness about the whole flow.
Pema Pera: knowing that what he really was could never get hurt -- now THAT is part of using Being as a resource. If you believe you can get hurt, you can't act like Suzuki!
Pema Pera: imitating him won't do, the bad boys would immediately "smell" your fear
Threedee Shepherd: In part the naturalness comes from the fact that the bad guys were engaging suzuki, and thus a response from him *fit*. If I see someone doing something incorrectly, without reference to me, stepping in with advice is much less natural .
Pema Pera: yes, stepping in would be a doing -- but there are still many ways to dance and respond
Threedee Shepherd: IO need to enter into a pattern with the othe as aprior necessity for the idea of "responding" makes sense
Threedee Shepherd: *making sense
Pema Pera: In New York City in the subway I often witness a couple teenager boys about to get rough with each other, and then an older man from the same minority just saying a word, softly, kindly and both toning down.
Pema Pera: beautiful not-doing
Pema Pera: yes, 3D, and we are already in a pattern with anyone around us
Pema Pera: just by being in the same place and time
Threedee Shepherd: more or less, and in the moment, the degree of more or less is important. The older man was already in a "deeper" pattern by being of the "same minority"
Pema Pera: yes, there has to be some hook
Pema Pera: but each moment a totally new world appears
Pema Pera: with totally new hooks
Pema Pera: seeing means being ready for each moment
Pema Pera: and the new hooks of each moment
Threedee Shepherd: agreed. This may sound tangential, but I hope not. I am fond of saying that the best time to answer a question is when it is asked.
Pema Pera: yes
Pema Pera: in the flow
Pema Pera: time being unreal means not only something very small like feeling "born again" at some point in your life but seeing the whole world as "born again" each moment, in an "unborn way"
Pema Pera: Suzuki seemed to have found a real sense of that
Pema Pera: more and more while he got older
Threedee Shepherd: The word "again" in born again, invokes more than just the moment
Pema Pera: yes, and "again" is an approximation
Pema Pera: better to drop that :)
Pema Pera: and better to drop "born" too
Pema Pera: "unborn" is more accurate
Pema Pera: since nothing exists
Pema Pera: only appearance seems to appear
Kojiro Eretz: Reminds me of the void... again...
Pema Pera: but not empty or nothing . . . beautiful beyond existence!
Pema Pera: rich beyond any possibility of possession
Pema Pera: intimate beyond any possibility of crossing distance
Avastu Maruti: Pema - can you, from a scientist's perspective, speak about "appearance"?
Pema Pera: science isn't there yet
Pema Pera: I'd giveit another 30,000 years or so, the rate we're going
Pema Pera: but we're getting closer! quantum mechanics is closer than classical mechanics, definitely
Kojiro Eretz: ?
Pema Pera: in a few hundred years we'll have learned to study the subject
Pema Pera: like we now study only objects
Pema Pera: then in a few thousand years we may really know how to go beyond the subject-object split
Pema Pera: and in a few tens of thousand years know how to get down to pure appearance
Pema Pera: (rough guesses of course)
Kojiro Eretz: Appearance?
Pema Pera: this table in front of you, if we were in RL
Pema Pera: would seem to be massive and solid
Pema Pera: but really is given, emperically, in your experience
Pema Pera: and your experience itself is an interpretation
Kojiro Eretz: Could be an illusion
Pema Pera: what really appears is appearance
Pema Pera: and then we call it experience
Pema Pera: and then we call it experience of a table outside us
Pema Pera: but realy all that we can honestly agree that happens is appearance
Pema Pera: but even that is not completely honest
Kojiro Eretz: What we percieve?
Pema Pera: the ing in appearing is not beyond doubt
Pema Pera: still a hidden assumption, that there is time
Pema Pera: all we see is appearance
Pema Pera: an appearance of I and of seeing and of table
Pema Pera: inner and outer
Pema Pera: and Being is that which allows appearance
Pema Pera: (not produces, manufacturs, creates)
Pema Pera: we call an "i" and a "perceiver" what we interpret
Pema Pera: "what we percieve" has many hidden assumptions ! ! !
Avastu Maruti: So you're implying that we're not really inside the head looking out they eyes at an "outside" world?
Pema Pera: indeed not
Pema Pera: all that is "in" appearance
Pema Pera: but words are tricky . . . . .
Pema Pera: you probably would say "in awareness", right?
Pema Pera: which is fine with me too! :)
Avastu Maruti: awareness is also a word appearing
Avastu Maruti: another idea
Pema Pera: yes
Pema Pera: all are
Avastu Maruti smiles
Pema Pera: /smiles too
Pema Pera: oops
Pema Pera smiles too
Avastu Maruti: so it seems that we must question the very fundamental assumptions
Pema Pera: all of them
Pema Pera: time, space, information
Pema Pera: anything
Pema Pera: self, other, happening
Pema Pera: but no rush :)
Pema Pera: we can be gently with ourselves and each other . . . .
Pema Pera: *gentle
Avastu Maruti: it seems that if this table is actually a translation of actuality, then all the information or knowledge ever received is subject to question
Adelene Dawner: ^.^
Pema Pera: within its (illusionary) context, the information can be very precise, like the precision of a great movie, whith is very hard to make well!
Pema Pera: but beyond that context it is just that -- an illusion
Avastu Maruti: then how do we know the illusion?
Pema Pera: is there a we? is there knowing? --- hehehe
Pema Pera: sorry, can't help it, Avastu!
Avastu Maruti smiles
Pema Pera: these are deep questions
Pema Pera: and I have only a small inkling of answers
Pema Pera: what little I know is what I see
Kojiro Eretz: Hmmm
Pema Pera: and the more I see the more I can try to say
Pema Pera: in that order only
Threedee Shepherd: In BEING, the actuality and the illusion both are
Adelene Dawner: I was pondering that earlier... and I think I found the inner edge of that ball of assumptions I've mentioned to you, Pem.
Pema Pera: all is in Being, yes, 3D
Pema Pera: yes, Adelene?
Adelene Dawner: The first assumption, that leads to the rest, seems to be the idea that the sensory input that we get actually *means* something.
Adelene Dawner: Everything else builds on that. Even cause and effect.
Pema Pera: yes, it has an inherent consistency that we *think* can ONLY be *caused* by there being something outside
Pema Pera: but dream and movie are counter examples already
Pema Pera: if only once in your life you get a real glimpse of the fact that causality is not really real, is illusionary . . . the peace and joy coming from that is impossible to describe
Adelene Dawner: Well, a movie 'means' that someone made a movie and you're watching it for whatever reason...
Pema Pera: yes, that part of the metaphor is not what I meant :)
Pema Pera: an airplane is like a bird -- but doesn't flap its wings
Adelene Dawner: an airplane isn't very much like a bird at all.
Pema Pera: well, if somebody has never seen an airplane, what is your first sentence of exlanation?
Pema Pera: like a bird -- seems like a good first sentence
Pema Pera: and then you improve from there further
Kojiro Eretz: "It's something that flys like a bird.. but not like a bird."
Adelene Dawner: If 'how it works' is central, maybe. But how it works isn't central - what it does is. It's more like a bus, or a cart, in that way.
Threedee Shepherd: causality is a locaL, piecewise linear approximation of BEING that is the whole
Pema Pera: fair enough, Kojiro
Pema Pera: that's true too, Adelene
Pema Pera: many metaphors for one thing, like many shadows of the same stick
Avastu Maruti: so Pema can we say that this "appearance" seems to happen in Consciousness?
Pema Pera: ultimately, nothing happens
Pema Pera: there is the *appearance* of something happening
Pema Pera: hapening is secondary
Pema Pera: appearance is primary
Avastu Maruti: so the appearance itself is "consciousness"?
Pema Pera: prior to consciousness, I'd say -- when trying to give as accurate a meaning to those words as I can
Avastu Maruti: what we call "consciousness"
Pema Pera: yes, consciousness still has a bit a smell of "mine" in there, for me -- but perhaps not for you
Pema Pera: appearance is neutral
Pema Pera: in appearance there are no beings, no human beings either
Pema Pera: only the appearance of them
Pema Pera: and seeing that is true liberation
Pema Pera: incredible
Pema Pera: unsayable
Threedee Shepherd: liberation from what?
Avastu Maruti: you're awfully Absolute tonight, my friend... ;)
Pema Pera: from all the illusions that hemmed us in
Pema Pera: haha, Avastu, tonight is the night, it seems!
Pema Pera: it helps that for me it is noon
Pema Pera: hehe
Threedee Shepherd: illusions are not, so what is?
Pema Pera: Being is
Threedee Shepherd: so
Pema Pera: yes?
Threedee Shepherd: Oneness does not necessarily imply homogeniety, does it?
Pema Pera: oh no, not at all!
Pema Pera: Being is beyond *all* dichotomies
Pema Pera: including oneness and many-ness
Pema Pera: including homegeneous and heterogeneous
Pema Pera: personal and impersonal
Pema Pera: etc
Avastu Maruti: Sounds a lot like the Heart Sutra...
Pema Pera: YES!
Pema Pera: it IS the heart sutra
Avastu Maruti: glad you're on point tonight, my friend.... ;)
Threedee Shepherd: So there could be a table, not only the appearance of one, and my illusionary interaction that leads me to say table?
Pema Pera: thanks, Avastu :)
Pema Pera: oh yes, all part of the story, 3D
Pema Pera: in Being, myriad stories (seem to) arise
Pema Pera: we (seem to be) in one realm
Pema Pera: starting with a Big Bang
Pema Pera: and look, here we are after 13.7 billion years!
Threedee Shepherd: In my daily life in the "relative world" I try not to bang my shins on low tables.
Pema Pera: just one story . . . .
Pema Pera: sure, part of the story
Avastu Maruti: If I'm following, it would seem that the "person" is the root of all stories
Pema Pera: now, Being is the root
Pema Pera: "person" is part of the furtniture
Pema Pera: part of the story
Pema Pera: hi Gen!
Pema Pera: may i sing a song?
genesis Zhangsun: Hi all!
Avastu Maruti: hello my friend
Kojiro Eretz: Hi :D
Threedee Shepherd: a particular locus of consciousness, Iwould say, Avastu.
Pema Pera: (not good at singing or rhyming though)
Avastu Maruti: hmm, you mean, like a dream?
Threedee Shepherd: a dream is one manifistation
Threedee Shepherd: and that may even be a useful typo :)
Avastu Maruti: yet it appears we cannot separate what we call the "waking state" from dreams
Threedee Shepherd: all moments are manifestations of the brain-body functioning, that does not mean they are the same manifestations
Avastu Maruti: that assumes the existence of a "brain-body", doesn't it?
Threedee Shepherd: replace brain-body with consciousness, then
Threedee Shepherd: lag, sorry
Avastu Maruti: I think what Pema was saying is that these manifestations are only appearance
Pema Pera: ultimately, yes
Kojiro Eretz: Oh man you guys really discuss things in an interesting way... first time in a good while that something got my brain to really work ... i gotta go for the night though. Im definitly coming back to these meetings.
Pema Pera: and that ultimately has huge relevance right here and now!
Pema Pera: thanks for stopping by Kojiro!
Threedee Shepherd: bye Koji
Pema Pera: please do come back!
Kojiro Eretz: G night all. and i will come back :D
Avastu Maruti: good bye my friend
genesis Zhangsun: bye Koji :)
Kojiro Eretz: Hopefully i can input more next time :P
Pema Pera: you're doing fine, Ko!
Pema Pera: Hi Steve!
genesis Zhangsun: Hi Steve
stevenaia Michinaga: hello, long session?
Pema Pera: poor Pia . . . .
stevenaia Michinaga: hi Genesis
genesis Zhangsun: :)
Pia Iger: Pia plan to just park the AV her. no idea how long the session would be.
Threedee Shepherd: Can I take it from the statement that "manifestations are only appearance" that "manifestations are"
stevenaia Michinaga: ..smile
Pema Pera: Being is
Pema Pera: and our attempt to call aspects of it "manifestations" are also appearances
Pema Pera: but may I sing a little song?
Threedee Shepherd: ok
Pia Iger: Nooo
Pema Pera: hahahaha
Pema Pera: okay
Avastu Maruti waits in anticipation
Pema Pera: Pia said no
Pema Pera: so no it is
Pia Iger: kidding
Pema Pera: hehehe
Pema Pera: well, I wish I could sing but . . . . let me try to be in the spirit
Pema Pera: just imagine . . . .
Pema Pera: . . . . that nobody would be caught anymore by a belief in causality
Pema Pera: just imagine . . . .
Pema Pera: . . . . no more hangups about all that anyone has done wrong to us
Pema Pera: just imagine . . . .
Pema Pera: . . . . no more thought and regret and remorse about what we have done wrong to others
Pema Pera: just imagine . . .
Pema Pera: . . . no more worry about the future, what to do, how to protect ourselves
Pema Pera: just imagine . . .
Pema Pera: . . . . just being able to open in love without any further ado
Pema Pera: just imagine . . . . .
Pema Pera: . . . . using Being as a resource in that way
Pema Pera: (end of song)
Pema Pera takes a humble bow
Threedee Shepherd: Pema, a possible metaphor: BEING is the infinitive form, Manifestations are the active form.
Avastu Maruti has that song stuck in the head
Avastu Maruti: now I have to go listen to some 80's music!
Pema Pera: yes, many ways of looking and dealing with all that, 3D, but the base, the resource is Being, concretely so
Pema Pera: hehe, Avastu
Threedee Shepherd: I USE a resource
Pema Pera: that's the problem
Threedee Shepherd: my locus of consciousness is not the entire resource, only a part of the pattern.
Threedee Shepherd: and the song said " using Being as a resource in that way" I note the word "using"
Pema Pera: well, we can do two things at the same time: trying to keep in mind Being as a resource, and trying to figure out the details of the relative view, like what you're asking now, 3D -- it is like a child playing, knowing/trusting in the love of the mother (Being as resource) while also being wrapped up in toys (atttempts at explaining how everything works; causality is one of our most wondrous toys!
Pema Pera: yes, 3D, words are tricky, and the song is not perfect, the "I USE" is a problem, I meant -- and "using" is strictly spearking a problem too . . . a way to wean us off using to something else . . . .
Pema Pera: so no I for sure
Pema Pera: and using only to wean off using
Pema Pera: slowly gently letting it all come unglued
Pema Pera: that's why a song works better than long explanations like this one . . . . .
Avastu Maruti: well, my transportation seems to have arrived early
Pema Pera: :)
Pema Pera: I should get up & going too
Pema Pera: thank you all so much for being here!
Avastu Maruti guesses Pema didn't hear the helicopter
stevenaia Michinaga: bye Pema, Avastu
Threedee Shepherd: I will ponder this resource of tonight :)
Pema Pera: I heard it, yes
Avastu Maruti: good bye my friend
Pema Pera: bye everybody!
Threedee Shepherd: bye
Pema Pera: and sorry for talking so much . . . .
Pema Pera: I'll try to be more quiet next time :)