The Guardian for this meeting was Adams Rubble. The comments are by Adams Rubble.
I arrived just in time to find Storm and Corvi in conversation.
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Hiya, Storm.Corvi and I chatted as Pemma arrived
Storm Nordwind: Hi! Just dropping by for a moment ...
Corvuscorva Nightfire smiles.
Corvuscorva Nightfire: good to see you always.
Storm Nordwind: Thank you! You too :)
Storm Nordwind: I'd forgotten I left a test mode on the fountain and needed to disable it in case it confused by people using the autologger
Storm Nordwind: So that's disabled now
Storm Nordwind: And the new 90sec effect should work OK
Corvuscorva Nightfire: it was great yesterday
Corvuscorva Nightfire: i was at the 7pm session..and found it useful.
Storm Nordwind: Pleased to hear it. :)
Storm Nordwind: Please excuse me for now!
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Adams!!
Corvuscorva Nightfire: bye, Storm, enjoy your afternoon/evening.
Storm Nordwind: Namaste
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Namaste.
Adams Rubble: Hi Storm. bye
Adams Rubble: Hello Corvi :)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Lovely dress!and then Sophia joined us. Sophia was to have some trouble starying and dissappeared, reappeared and then disappeared again later
Corvuscorva Nightfire: what a rich color.
Corvuscorva Nightfire: the red with the purple is elegent.
Adams Rubble: Thanks. I looked at it and hated it right before I came :)
Adams Rubble: hehe
Corvuscorva Nightfire: ohhhh!
Adams Rubble: Hello Pema :)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Hola, Pema.
Pema Pera: Hi Corvi, Adams!
Pema Pera: Have you seen our new 90-sec silence system yet, Adams?
Pema Pera: (about to begin)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Hi all
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Good to see you again, Pema.
Pema Pera: good morning!
Pema Pera: I like the mist that Storm implemented for the 90-seconds
Pema Pera: nice to watch, a bit dream like
Adams Rubble: Hello Sophia :)Maxine made her appearance next and briefly sat on Pema and Pema and Maxine remember last April
Pema Pera: hi Sophia!
sophia Placebo: hi corvuscorva
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Hiya, Sophia..nice to meet you after reading your words!
Adams Rubble: Very nice dress Sophia :)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Please call me Corvi.
sophia Placebo: ty adams
sophia Placebo: nice to meet you too adams
Adams Rubble: Yes, you too Sophia :)
Pema Pera: and welcome here as Play as Being guardian :-)
Adams Rubble: Yes welcome to the gorup :)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Hi, Maxine!Pema asks Maxine about her view of the unconscious
Adams Rubble: Hello Maxine :)
Pema Pera: good morning, Maxine -- must be early for you, 7 am?
Maxine Walden: hi, all, yes a bit early here, but wanting to join in...
Pema Pera: you're joining in all right :-)
Pema Pera: hahaha
Pema Pera: seeing you here early in the morning reminds me of the many conversations we had in April last year
Maxine Walden: yes, I was thinking of that as well, Pema, we did have many then, early and memorable
Pema Pera: often we were the only two present during the morning sessions
Adams Rubble enjoyed reading those conversations
Pema Pera: :)
Maxine Walden: right! often in the teahouse which I called the teachouse, because I learned so much
Maxine Walden: ah, adams, yes we had good discussions
Pema Pera: yes, we started our culture of educational typos there
Adams Rubble: wb Sophia :)
Pema Pera: welcome back, Sophia!
Maxine Walden: indeed, I think I was one of the first, could not help but calling it the teachouse, my fingers just did it
sophia Placebo: ty
sophia Placebo: hi all
Maxine Walden: you know, time is funny: seems like longer than a year sometimes, and then also shorter than a year as well
Pema Pera: yes, both
Adams Rubble nods about the funny time
Corvuscorva Nightfire nodsnods.
Pema Pera: Maxine, in the spirit of continuing last spring's conversations, may I ask about your view of the unconscious?Korii and Steve rezz in next
Maxine Walden: ah....(early in the morning, let's see what thoughts I have)...any specific questions about the unconscious, Pema?
Pema Pera: oh, and before I forget, just to make sure of the terms, and starting at square one, what is the difference between subconscious and unconscious -- or are you only refering to the subconscious?
Maxine Walden: in my view the subconscious is the more popular term for the unconscious, that many people refer to the unconscious as the subconconsious because it seems so, well, under the conscious
Pema Pera: yes, in Dutch too
Pema Pera: nice to see our fountain going "sub" too :-)
Maxine Walden: that's really a lovely feature....Storm did a lovely thing here....
Adams Rubble: Hello Steve :)Maxine continues...
Pema Pera: Hi Steve!
Adams Rubble: Hello Korii :)
Maxine Walden: hi Steve
Pema Pera: and hi Korii!
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Hi, Korii, Steve.
stevenaia Michinaga: Morning
Korii Tiger: hi
sophia Placebo: hi stev and kori
Pema Pera: Maxine is just about to give us an early Sunday mini-talk about the unconscious, for those of us who are just waking up :-)
Pema Pera: on my special request
stevenaia Michinaga: goodie...listens
Maxine Walden: well, we will see about that...but I have been impressed with the unconscious regions of the mind for a long timeEliza slips in
Maxine Walden: and it seems to me that they comprise an inner cosmos as vast and complex and barely scratched, understood, as the outer cosmos
Maxine Walden: just in terms of the depth of the recesses of the mind, how every event that has happened in our lives, and
Maxine Walden: perhaps the experience of mankind seems to be registered in the unconscious
Maxine Walden: and in certain circumstances can be recalled to consciousness, or be triggered and felt in the NOW of the moment
Maxine Walden: often quite intensely...as if 'out of the blue'.
Maxine Walden: But there is also a deep wisdom in the unconscious
Maxine Walden: which for me is seen in the dream and the dreaming process
Maxine Walden: as if the 'dreamer' is trying to organize our experiences, and convey the lessons of the past
Maxine Walden: into the present, or to lend meaning from past experiences of the species if not the individual
Maxine Walden: to the present...it is quite awesome and humbling for me to consider...especially that inner wisdom
Pema Pera is curious about the difference between this notion of the unconscious, and that what Stim calls "using a(n altogether) different mind" -- but perhaps that's a detour here?
Maxine Walden: that is of interest to me as well, Pema, could you give us a reminder of what Stim means?
Pema Pera: Stim does not speak of the unconscious, since that comes from a different set of definitions than the sets that he uses
Pema Pera: but at least some of what you ascribe to the unconscious, especially the wisdom, the vastness, and the otherness seems to correspond at least in some way to what Stim calls using a different mind
Pema Pera: as opposed to using the ordinary mind
Adams Rubble: Hello Eliza :)Reverielarke joins us
Pema Pera: hi Eliza!
Maxine Walden: hi, Eliza,
Pema Pera: a mind, or a way of functioning of the mind, that is non conceptual
sophia Placebo: hi eliza
Maxine Walden: yes, Pema, yes, I think these aspects of the mind may be similar, the non-conceptual, almost pre-thinking aspect
Maxine Walden: it is rather clear that this aspect of mind precedes, evolutionarily, the advent of thought which may be interesting in that it 'feels' more advanced than thought, at least for me
Pema Pera: and Stim would probably call it non-evolutionary
Pema Pera: pointing to a more radical difference
Maxine Walden: ah...
Pema Pera: but the phenomenology, if you can call it that, may be similar, or at least have overlap
Maxine Walden: (I do think my attempts to give some timeline as to development may not seem helpful here; just my own interest perhaps)
Pema Pera: perhaps projecting Stim's "other mind" into the world of concepts can let us talk about the other mind as the unconsious?
Maxine Walden: that is an interesting consideration
Pema Pera: so as a way to make sense of it, we can try to embed it in an evolutionary story
Pema Pera: but as you sometimes indicates, there is a clear component of it coming "from elsewhere"
Maxine Walden: again lovely interlude...
Pema Pera: yes, a shift to a different mind . . . :-)
Maxine Walden: yes indeed...to that wider mind...
Maxine Walden: where the sun comes out
Maxine Walden: so interesting, it is so peaceful right now...and makes me feel that my previous comments were more chatter...important at times, but a bit of chatter from this more peaceful place
Pema Pera nods in agreement
Pema Pera: (about my own comments :-)
Eliza Madrigal: :) This place is satisfying, but the conversation I arrived to enjoyable also :)
Corvuscorva Nightfire is all for chatter, to be honest.
Eliza Madrigal: :))
Corvuscorva Nightfire: as well as the rest.
Pema Pera: the best of both, hey? (^_^)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: mmhmm
Pema Pera: I am especially intrigued, Maxine, about the unconscious not being our own, not personal -- can you say a bit more about that aspect?
Maxine Walden: yes, that is one of the most intriguing for me as well: that the unconscious seems to be the repository of what Jung would call the collective unconscious, the collective memory of humankind (or perhaps even further back)
Maxine Walden: so that there may be universal experiences as it were that we all have shared, our ancestors, but in some sense
Maxine Walden: us currently ...our own 'dreaming' processes might access those unconsconsciously registered experiences uniquely...but that they are there for us all
stevenaia Michinaga: a psychic link to past memories?
Maxine Walden: yes, steve, something like that. How does that seem?
stevenaia Michinaga: like an un-measurable truth
Adams Rubble: "You can be in my dream if I can be in yours". Dylan said that
stevenaia Michinaga: there, but we don't know how
Maxine Walden: some say that the more deeply we delve beyond differentiated thought the more unity we glean in the unconscious...the more the same...
Maxine Walden: yes, and yet we seem consciously to try to avoid these awarenesses...even hate the awareness of our unity...I think because we hold our differences to be so 'precious'
Pema Pera: when scientific types ask you "how can that possibly be, by what mechanism" what do you answer them, Maxine?
Maxine Walden: our differences as possessions
Maxine Walden: Pema, mechanism? just elab the question a bit more please?
Pema Pera: for a scientist the notion of a collective unconscious may seem quite strange
Pema Pera: is it molecular, electromagnetic, . . . ?
Pema Pera: how do we contact this mysterious source of human collective wisdom?
stevenaia Michinaga: genetic
Pema Pera: Hi Reverie!Wol pops in next
Pema Pera: welcome back to Play as Being!
Eliza Madrigal: Hi Reverie
Reverielarke Wirtanen: Hello, Pema, and everyone. :)
Pema Pera: (Reverie is an old friend of mine in RL, visited us here once before)
Adams Rubble: Hello Reverie
Reverielarke Wirtanen: Hi- please call me Rev; it's simpler. :)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: there are lots of ways we share ideas, concepts and symbols...
Adams Rubble: welcome
Pema Pera: oh, I like Reverie . . . .
Reverielarke Wirtanen: AH, ok.
Reverielarke Wirtanen: :)
Pema Pera: :-)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: but the shar-edness...is also in how we interact.
Corvuscorva Nightfire: as though we were one huge mind...
Maxine Walden: yes, the scientist, used to differentiated thought, even treasuring it, may have difficulty with this notion.
Corvuscorva Nightfire: not just in the thoughts we have but in our doing thoughts together.
Pema Pera: yes, I agree Corvi, but most of my colleagues would consider that a meaningless metaphor, and I'm curious how Maxine and other psychologists like her respond to my colleagues
Corvuscorva Nightfire: i am talking in a strictly material idea 1) (from last night, sense)
Corvuscorva Nightfire: a collective unconscious may be just traded info?
Pema Pera: and I guess Stim's way of talking about a "different mind" circumvents that problem by positing that mind as outside our normal realm of concepts, including concepts about the physical world as a whole
Pema Pera smiles at Corvi
Pema Pera: ah, interesting Corvi!
Pema Pera: but how does the trading work then?
Pema Pera: if you suddenly get a flash of insight from a distant past?
Maxine Walden: I would probably speak to the scientist about the part of the mind that functions beyond thought, even pre-thought...such as the communication between animals..but that we do as well. Want an example?
Pema Pera: any time, Max!
Maxine Walden: Well, when I come to the group feeling something intensely, fiercely, even, without saying a word, or even having much body movement others will pick up the quality of the fierceness and register it, get agitated or something...it is a kind of emotional communication just be being present
Maxine Walden: or if I come to the group having had a very significant, intense dream...if we watch the group interaction, comments, it is likely that some sense of that dream will register with the group...our inner selves communicate in pre-lingual ways...if we know how to listen
Maxine Walden: being open to the unconscious communication of such affect or experience may not please the scientist but it can be compelling
Reverielarke Wirtanen: So, are we talking about non-verbal communication, then? Nuances beyond that which we consciously perceive but nonetheless understand?
Maxine Walden: yes, in a manner of speaking...and the experience of receiving those communications can feel like something out of the blue...
Reverielarke Wirtanen: Right, I see.
Maxine Walden: not sure where they came from
Reverielarke Wirtanen: Language has come to eclipse much of that.
Eliza Madrigal: Merely sitting in presence adds space to a conversation also...why contemplative people can say much in a ":)"
Reverielarke Wirtanen: Agreed.
Maxine Walden: perhaps one more thought here re the unconscious as we have been talking about it: what I have been saying is re a mind which has evolved from the past, non-verbal communication, unity etc...what Stim and Pema and we are trying to do is to reach beyond the past, maybe into the future...does that make sense?
Eliza Madrigal: yes
Maxine Walden: the contemplative mind, presences...freeing us from the chatter/encumbrances/doubts, etc...into the spacious future
Pema Pera: this is a very big topic, Maxine . . . if I can go back one step: but if I may play the devil's advocate here, for clarification, how can we receive nonverbal communication in the form of wisdom from the distant past -- or is that not a concern for you, Maxine?
Pema Pera: pesonally, I agree with the phenomena you describe, and I recognize and respect them -- the question is whether and if so how we can reconcile them with our current scientific knowledge
Reverielarke Wirtanen: Oooh, might I interrupt? Sorry, but suddenly I am thinking of Noh theater...
Pema Pera: please do, Reverie!
Reverielarke Wirtanen: I've not seen it myself, but from my readings... it seems to carry something with it
Reverielarke Wirtanen: from hundreds of years ago
Corvuscorva Nightfire: Hiya, Wol.I have to leave then and the rest of the log is curtesy of the autologger
Eliza Madrigal: Hi Wol :)
Pema Pera have watched Noh several times, was especially impressed by outdoors Noh, with firer burning around the circumference on a full moon night in Kyoto . . . .
Adams Rubble: Hello Wol :)
Pema Pera: *has
Pema Pera: Hi Wol
Wol Euler: hello eliza, corvi, pema, adams, maxine, steve
Maxine Walden: my understanding here, Pema, is that such ancestral lessons are registered in our unconscious and can be triggered by many things, dreams, external triggers, mythology...ah maybe such as Noh
Pema Pera: and yes, the sounds especially are erie and deep-woods-animal-like
Wol Euler: sorry I'm late, time change this morning
Reverielarke Wirtanen: may/may not be relevant to this idea of the past- the nonverbal conveying of information
Reverielarke Wirtanen: Hello, Wol
Pema Pera: but the question is then, is there a material basis for this "unconscious"
Wol Euler: hello reverie, sorry, didn't mean to leave you out :)
Reverielarke Wirtanen: no worries :)
Pema Pera: or is it a metaphor, or something non-material, or something totally outside our realm?
Reverielarke Wirtanen: I see what you're getting at, Pema- what is the mechanism, as it were
Pema Pera: yes
Maxine Walden: but if there is a questing wisdom, as from the dreaming process it might link the registration from the past into a 'dream' toward conscious recognition
Pema Pera: just so I understand, Maxine, do you prefer to avoid the question as irrelevant, or do you think it is interesting to address it?
Pema Pera: about the mechanism?
Maxine Walden: not sure if this answers your question re mechanism, Pema, but there is a useful metaphor for a mechanism
Adams Rubble: Is it connecting with the past so much as connecting with the eternal which also was available to the ancients
Pema Pera: to be specific let me put on my scientist's hat, if that's okay, and I can ask you then whether there is anything more than poetry here?
Pema Pera: nice sounding word but no real mechanism?
Pema Pera: and if so how and where?
Pema Pera hoping that he is not mistaken for the real Pema in talking this way :-)
Wol Euler raises an eyebrow.
Maxine Walden: but I find useful to consider that we each have had our unknowable distress (as infants) 'known' about via the mind of a compassionate mothering person who by tending to our unknownable distress makes it knowable and thus thinkable. Does this do anything re the mechanism you are asking about, Pema?
stevenaia Michinaga: if we don;t know the mechanisim of conciousness, how can we know the mechanism of sub-conciousness
Reverielarke Wirtanen: I am curious about this too... whenever I would read about Jung's collective unconscious idea, I would silently wonder, how does this work? What is actually happening here? Subatomic particles, what? ;)
Adams Rubble: I need to go folks. Have a good day :)Steve departs
Adams Rubble: bye :)
Wol Euler: bye adams, I'm sorry to miss you
Pema Pera: yes, me too, and I see three quite different possibilities. Each of the three are interesting, and plausible in some way.
Pema Pera: bye Adams!
Maxine Walden: Eric Kandel, neural scientist, got a Nobel Prize for his work on memory, and showed that learning is registered neurally and passed on genetically
Wol Euler: and bye pema, takecare
Pema Pera: yes, that would be one of the three
Pema Pera: Let me name them:
Maxine Walden: other two?
Pema Pera: 1) we will find ways to explain everything within the context of current science; as Reverie hinted at, through subtle non-verbal clues, but non-mysterious in the end, perhaps layered on touch, smell, subtle visual communication, etc.
Pema Pera: 2) we will discover radically new extensions of current science, perhaps on the level of chi, etc, something beyond current insights, and which can then become an extension of science
Pema Pera: 3) we may find that our whole realm of space and time and matter and all that we feel embedded in, the whole playground for science, in itself is just one realm among others, and the unconscious goes beyond our realm altogether in some sense
Pema Pera: Which of the three would you bet on, Maxine?
Maxine Walden: number 3 is my bet
Eliza Madrigal: :)
Pema Pera: yes, mine too
Pema Pera: although I'd bet part of it on 2) and 1) as well, but not for everything
Wol Euler: must it be either/or?
Wol Euler: I find it extremely likely that 1 is also at work
Pema Pera: I think it is all three, Wol, yes
Pema Pera: but I also think that neither 1 nor 1 and 2 will be enough to explain everything that Maxine talked about
Maxine Walden: most interesting to me is #3, but at other levels 1 an 2 likely also operating...many strands likely
Pema Pera: and Stim talks about 3, when he talks about a "different mind" I bet :)
Pema Pera: so 3 may be the place where Maxine's unconscious and Stim's different mind may overlap
Wol Euler: I thought scientists considered themselves bound by Occam's razor? :)
Pema Pera: sure, Corvi
Pema Pera: as much as we can
Pema Pera: but what can't be explained by a simple known mechanism requires an extension of known mechanisms
Wol Euler: fair enough; but can it not?
Pema Pera: that's the question
Wol Euler: (I wan't here at the beginning, I am jumping in halfway and trying to guess the main course by teh crumbs on the table :)
Pema Pera: and nobody knows what a future science may discover
stevenaia Michinaga: I must go, see you tonightMaxine goes too
Wol Euler: bye steve, take care
Reverielarke Wirtanen: be well
Pema Pera: no, you're dancing along just fine, Wol :-)
Eliza Madrigal: Bye Steven
Pema Pera: bye Steve!
Pema Pera: in fact, I should be going soon too
Corvuscorva Nightfire: bye Stevie
Pema Pera: and Max, we'll see each other in a few hours again -- and many of you, something tells me :-)
Wol Euler: :)
Eliza Madrigal: :)
Images 0 | ||
---|---|---|
No images to display in the gallery. |