Mickorod Renard: do you think we all originated from one source,maybe africa?
Rish Bleriot: thast what the news says
Vendy Walpole: or from universe?
Mickorod Renard: well, I guess you cant go wwrong with sayin we are from the same universe
Vendy Walpole: what if we are controled by beings from universe and invented for their experiments?
aurel Miles: Hello Fefonz
Vendy Walpole: just one of possibilites...
Mickorod Renard: well, anything is posible
Fefonz Quan: which universe? (sorry)
Vendy Walpole: thera are many others..
Mickorod Renard: I sometimes wonder what our purpose is,,like perhaps for collecting raw information
Vendy Walpole: this with galaxies, milky way etc...:)
Vendy Walpole: good question...I wonder too Mick
Fefonz Quan: ah, thia univers.
Fefonz Quan: this*
Mickorod Renard: maybe we are all connected to a central collection point of information gathering
Vendy Walpole: sort of server, hug one...grins
Mickorod Renard: for some higher purpose
Vendy Walpole: which we are not avbe to understand even
Vendy Walpole: able
Mickorod Renard: grin
Fefonz Quan: some Scifi writers were entertaining this ideas
Scathach Rhiadra: evidence anyone?
aurel Miles looks around for a couple of white mice...
Fefonz Quan: or a good joke :)
aurel Miles giggles to herself
aurel Miles: 42
Mickorod Renard: yea
Fefonz Quan: yep
Rish Bleriot: are u familiar with the concept of morphogenetic fields ... propounded by Rupert Sheldrake ?
Mickorod Renard: or maybe we are a secret weopon sent to distroy all life here,,we are doing a good job
aurel Miles: i'm not
aurel Miles: sounds like science
Vendy Walpole: neither I
aurel Miles: i think we are just part of the big picture
Mickorod Renard: no,,sounds interesting
aurel Miles: but we like to give ourselves airs
Fefonz Quan: Rish, elaboratin?
Mickorod Renard: fill us in Rish
Fefonz Quan: +o
Rish Bleriot: its the same theory ... that there is a central "server" absorbing info thru satellite terminals .... (us)
Rish Bleriot: Sheldrake is a british scientist who did some experiments which even "prove" the existence of this network
Fefonz Quan: as information sensors, we produce a huge amount of internal noise :)
Rish Bleriot: its a lot to type .... but he put it all in a book called "the presence of the past"
Vendy Walpole: prove Rish?
Mickorod Renard: wow
Rish Bleriot: yep prove
Mickorod Renard: another book to read
aurel Miles: it's called God, I think.
Rish Bleriot: he observed that once smthn has been learnt by a group of ppl ... it becomes easier for a larger group to learn it
Fefonz Quan: well Rish we really like short summaries (fefonz thinks of the 10 books he is in the middle of)
Rish Bleriot: so he devised some experiments to prove this point
Vendy Walpole: like...example?
Vendy Walpole: with the group
Fefonz Quan: (since there are more teachers around?)
aurel Miles: the theory of critical mass
Rish Bleriot: and he beleives its a side -effect of leakage of knowledge from our "morphogenetic fields" which store all our experiences
aurel Miles: proved with monkeys in japan
aurel Miles: about 20 years ago
aurel Miles: i remember
aurel Miles: also - references Jung's theory of the collective unconscious
Scathach Rhiadra: ah, the monkeys on an island, learnt to use tools, then monkeys on mainland could use them too?
aurel Miles: how, except semantically, is this different from the work that has gone before it?
Rish Bleriot: smthn like that scath
Mickorod Renard: cool
Mickorod Renard: just checked,,that book is £15 second hand on amazon
Fefonz Quan: and there is no communication that transfers that information?
Mickorod Renard: will have to save up
Rish Bleriot: word of caution mick .... its like reading atlas shrugged ...only 10 times more boring
aurel Miles: it's an interesting phenomenon and it has been proven many ways - many times
Scathach Rhiadra: :))
aurel Miles: i'm not sure that means we are a comptuer network
Rish Bleriot: no
Mickorod Renard: lol,,maybe I will give it a miss
aurel Miles: i'm sure we are connected
Rish Bleriot: better than a simple network :)
Scathach Rhiadra: didn't think anthing could be more boring than atlas Shrugged:)
Fefonz Quan: So the ability to write non-boring stuff didn't pass the critical point :)
Mickorod Renard: I think we are connected too,,but thats just my thoughts
Vendy Walpole: I just got an idea...what if we are moved by thoughts as Honda managed to move ASIMO?
arabella Ella: which book are you talking about?
Vendy Walpole: the humanoid robot
Rish Bleriot: of course we are Vendy ....
Vendy Walpole: :)
Rish Bleriot: the govt thinks for us :))
Vendy Walpole: others thought
aurel Miles: i have a copy of the journalist's legal guide if you're looking for something dull...
arabella Ella: ok ty
Fefonz Quan: how do you think you move your hand vendy?
Vendy Walpole: you do not get my point
sophia Placebo: hi alone
Vendy Walpole: know about Asimo?
Vendy Walpole: he is moved by other's thought
Fefonz Quan: only the asimo.v version :)
Vendy Walpole: as we can be by some higher intelligence
Mickorod Renard: any more ide's on connectedness?
Fefonz Quan: (only i can't see Gen?)
Fefonz Quan: ok, clouding up...
Vendy Walpole: of course, we are all just a part of oneness whateve rit can be called
Fefonz Quan: There is some phenomenon with the flying locus i think
Mickorod Renard: maybe of being too
Fefonz Quan: where one locus (is it the right word?) has two modes of operation, alone and in the group
Mickorod Renard: mm?
Mickorod Renard: carry on Fef
Vendy Walpole: can you explain it ?
Fefonz Quan: dict. delay...
Fefonz Quan: locust is teh right word.
Mickorod Renard: ok,,the creepy flying things
aurel Miles: the locust has a locus
aurel Miles: ;)
Fefonz Quan: at least i heard from one scientist, that by switching something on the back of it's leg, a single locust can go to the 'group mode', so teh whole group when it flies seems like one correlated big organism
aurel Miles: (he does, though)
Rish Bleriot: i think we lost our locus standii ...
Mickorod Renard: wow
Rish Bleriot: but why just locusts fef ? the same wld apply to pigeons ...geese ...
Fefonz Quan: and you can see a group of thousand of locusts turn together
Rish Bleriot: herd mentality ...
Rish Bleriot: it even applies to football fans
aurel Miles: starlings
aurel Miles: they even poop together
Mickorod Renard: lemmings
Fefonz Quan: geese, as i know (holgerson wise), fly in a big V, each one follow the one in front of him, this is different
Rish Bleriot: lol
aurel Miles: i have had to clean up my car after it
aurel Miles: starlings are really fond of blackberries - did you know that?
Rish Bleriot: what abt football fans ? one goes crazy .... they all go crazy ...
aurel Miles: geese flock in vs
Fefonz Quan: aurel, that is the influence of teh ether they are all surrounded by :)
aurel Miles: but starlings fly in clouds
Scathach Rhiadra: mob mentality
aurel Miles: and so do pigeons
Rish Bleriot: fish ...
Mickorod Renard: and moths
aurel Miles: big wheeling, synchronized clouds
Mickorod Renard: bats
arabella Ella: collective intelligence perhaps?
aurel Miles: searching for blackberies and a pale colored car to poop on...
Mickorod Renard: that was what we were thinking Ara
Mickorod Renard: whether we are connected to a central ,,,thing
arabella Ella nods
Fefonz Quan: at least what i heard about the locust, is that you can see his mind 'switch' to a total different mode of action when in the group.
aurel Miles: jung says humans share it
Rish Bleriot: jung went to football matches im sure
aurel Miles: big tottspurs fan.
aurel Miles: hotspurs
aurel Miles: no doubt.
arabella Ella: collective intelligence is attributed to humans when they follow the crowd to adopt for example new technology as a crowd after the early adopter stage and after the technology has gone beyone the tipping point
Fefonz Quan: this reminds me also about the explanation of why we sometimes 'jump' to catch teh bed just after falling asleep
Mickorod Renard: so,,I wonder why,,if we are the same?
Scathach Rhiadra: what about groups who seem to share or feed off each others religious, um, escasty
Fefonz Quan: In india they say Mick: 'same same but different'
Rish Bleriot: u wonder mick ? but if u did a DNA analyses .... theres a fleetingly small difeerence between ppl ....
Rish Bleriot: even between species
Mickorod Renard: yes,,I read that
Mickorod Renard: I have the science journal
Mickorod Renard: incredible
Mickorod Renard: one would think,,from what we discussed,,that we are programable?
Fefonz Quan: but difference is not only genes. I can have _exactly_ the same PC like you Rish, but they have very different softwares and memory on them
Rish Bleriot: yeah but the tech limitations of both wld be the same
Fefonz Quan: sure we are mick. didn't you learn to read at school?
arabella Ella: i think there must be some sort of contagion going on amongst human brains when something like a new technology or mobile phones are adopted on a massive scale ... or religions ... or popular tunes
Mickorod Renard: well,,only just
Mickorod Renard: how u mean Ara?
aurel Miles: the zeitgeist, you mean?
arabella Ella: more to do with diffusion of innovation ... oh ... shhh
aurel Miles: you know - something that is fairly well known in communications theory etc etc
aurel Miles: might be helpful here
aurel Miles: you pick up a lot more than you realize you do
aurel Miles: through overhearing stuff
aurel Miles: seeing ads
Mickorod Renard: yes?
aurel Miles: being exposed to cultural references
aurel Miles: so by the time even the slowest of us
aurel Miles: picks up a co puter
Mickorod Renard: subliminal sugestion?
aurel Miles: for example
Fefonz Quan: co puter?
aurel Miles: we already have a good idea of what to expect fro it
aurel Miles: not anything sinister like that
arabella Ella: yes and diffusion of innovation is used a lot for marketing
aurel Miles: just the fact of being in the flow of life
aurel Miles: it is not in the least
arabella Ella: yes
aurel Miles: mysterious
aurel Miles: it would be weird if we didn't
arabella Ella: it is not mysterious at all IMHO
arabella Ella: it is part of what they call take up of new technology
arabella Ella: or new products
Mickorod Renard: but is it a freak of nature,,or by creation???
arabella Ella: or services
arabella Ella: no it is a natural reaction for humans mick
aurel Miles: soooo
aurel Miles: what's the point?
Mickorod Renard: exactly
arabella Ella: the point is ... contagion
Mickorod Renard: now we are back to question one
arabella Ella: influence from human brain to human brain
aurel Miles: that's not a point
aurel Miles: it's a condition
arabella Ella: up to u what u wish to call it
arabella Ella: for me a point is
aurel Miles: no
arabella Ella: this
arabella Ella: .
Mickorod Renard: grin
aurel Miles: i'm not being judgemental
aurel Miles: i am being factual
arabella Ella: of course
aurel Miles: saying the point is contagion
aurel Miles: doesn't tell me anythiong
aurel Miles: abuot what you are trying to say
aurel Miles: it's like sticking your tongue out
aurel Miles: so please elaborate
arabella Ella: i was reacting to what Fefonz said about locusts and said it also applies to humans in some contexts
arabella Ella: plain and simple
Mickorod Renard: so,,,are we thinking that our ability to pick up information is like a virus,,or because we have a cause to do so?
Vendy Walpole: must be a cuse, I believe
Fefonz Quan: well isn't it primarily a tool for survival Mick?
arabella Ella: i think there comes a stage when we do pick up info like a virus
Mickorod Renard: maybe a curse
arabella Ella agrees with Fefonz it is part of our survival kit
Mickorod Renard: but we seem to be so sponge like it goes beyond the need for survival
Fefonz Quan: our inability to sort out the irrelevant information, and our thinking that more is always better, i tend to agree is a kind of desease
Mickorod Renard: more like something we were disigned to do,,collect information
Fefonz Quan: maybe like with sugars, we were evolutionary planned for very different environment, and applied in our comfort abundant life this is the effect
aurel Miles: do you believe in intelligent design, then Mick?
Mickorod Renard: I think I do
aurel Miles: that's a radical thought
Fefonz Quan nods
aurel Miles: popular in the bible belt
Mickorod Renard: well,,I bet its 50/50 in world thought
arabella Ella: it is definitely one possibility
Fefonz Quan: well 50% never read a book, at least
Fefonz Quan: (just saying 50/50 is meaningless in that context)
genesis Zhangsun: so you believe god fills in the holes where science cannot?
Mickorod Renard: grin,,Fef, is that the side u think I belong to?
genesis Zhangsun: this is my understanding of intelligent design
aurel Miles: strikes me as interesting how we can get so close to the edge of fundementalism - can we be there without losing the ability to discern things sicentifically?
Fefonz Quan: surely not Mick. (though if you'll continue with that kind of conclution deduction... ;-))
Mickorod Renard: Well, I am not sure i have defined God yet in my own head
Mickorod Renard: he he he
Mickorod Renard: maybe he is a crazy scientist
genesis Zhangsun: I think intelligent design sees god as a sort of master architect
Vendy Walpole: has anyone defined God?
aurel Miles: well - baptists in the u.s. see it as literalism
Mickorod Renard: maybe in thier own heads
aurel Miles: and defend it as such
aurel Miles: legally
Fefonz Quan agrees with Gen
aurel Miles: in opposition to the theory of evolution
aurel Miles: and my question is - can we play on the edge of that belief without choosing up sides?
arabella Ella: quite a few religions today have no objection to evolution
aurel Miles: i am aware
Mickorod Renard: well,,what better wy to design something,,one that evolves when nesesary
aurel Miles: i am talking about intelligent design
arabella Ella: science does not explain everything
arabella Ella: and another alternative would be a soup of chaos
Mickorod Renard: I am sure , sensibly, that both sides can work together
genesis Zhangsun: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design
aurel Miles: maybe they can but historicall they don't - i draw your attention to the battles currently being waged in the schools of the central united states - where parents who believe in intelligent design are removing their children from sicence class.
genesis Zhangsun: I suggest people read this before signing on to intelligent design :)
aurel Miles: thanks gen
genesis Zhangsun: yes the problem aurel
Mickorod Renard: ok cool,,thanks
aurel Miles: that's the point i am trying to make
genesis Zhangsun: is that intelligent design proponents
genesis Zhangsun: are claiming that their theory
genesis Zhangsun: is on par with science
Mickorod Renard: but that is extremism,,in my opinion
genesis Zhangsun: and should be taught in schools
genesis Zhangsun: but of course no one can prove intelligent design
arabella Ella: exactly ... fundamentalism of whatever sort is always wrong and bigoted
genesis Zhangsun: therefore it cannot be "scientific" as proponents claim
genesis Zhangsun: as a belief system, why not
genesis Zhangsun: as good of an explanation as any I suppose
arabella Ella: i dont think everyone who believes in intelligent design would take such a stance genesis and auriel
genesis Zhangsun: though seems quite simplistic to me
Mickorod Renard: well, i had basic religious study at school,,nd it never determined which way one chose to follow,,,cience or design
genesis Zhangsun: uh in fact arabella that is the whole history behind intelligent design it was stimulated out of a court case
arabella Ella: i disagree gen
arabella Ella: it may be so in some parts of the USA
arabella Ella: but most european christians think otherwise
genesis Zhangsun: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Aguillard
genesis Zhangsun: perhaps you are talking about something else arabella
Mickorod Renard: In europe,,well the Uk,,we dont take anything serious
arabella Ella: Gen i cannot open any other browsers while on SL but ...
arabella Ella: dont forget wikipedia is not scientific information either
arabella Ella: and it is user generated content ... users may have their own agendas
aurel Miles: maybe we can take this opportunity to think about communication
genesis Zhangsun: uh sure
Mickorod Renard: how u mean Aurel?
aurel Miles: we don't seem to have the basis for meaningful discussion on this issue
genesis Zhangsun: but really I think most people would agree that "intelligent design" was something created by what is called the Discovery Institute in 1994
genesis Zhangsun: it isn't an old phenomenon
genesis Zhangsun: sorry got to go
Mickorod Renard: thats true Aurel,,I think we have diversified
Mickorod Renard: well,,that was a quick hour
aurel Miles: yes - i should be off as well
aurel Miles: dinner won't cook itself...
Mickorod Renard: ok,,I have to go now Rish
Rish Bleriot: bye Mick ...
Rish Bleriot: was nice talking to u
Mickorod Renard: thanks for commin tonite
Mickorod Renard: yea,,likewise
Images 0 | ||
---|---|---|
No images to display in the gallery. |